Saturday, July 25, 2026
How It Happened: The Corruption Of Donald J Trump
What does Israel have on Trump, one might ask?
— BRITT (@54BRITT54) May 27, 2026
Let’s have a look… shall we. pic.twitter.com/IAbkJ7wpQu
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The White House: Was He A Manchurian Candidate The Whole Time Or Was He Compromised?
Was Trump lying the whole time?
— Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) July 24, 2026
or was he just a puppet the whole time? pic.twitter.com/ATCdJUhPIZ
Sunday, June 28, 2026
Reality Check: AI & Predictive Policing_how it gets used against us
Hacked data shines light on homeland security’s AI surveillance ambitions
Records show DHS tech incubator spending large sums on partnerships that would expand surveillance capabilities
Hacked data from the Department of Homeland Security’s technology incubator shows it funding a variety of companies that would expand its surveillance capabilities with artificial intelligence, the Guardian can reveal.
The projects at the Office of Industry Partnership (OIP) include automated surveillance in airports; adapters allowing agents to use phones for biometric scanning; and an AI platform that ingests all 911 call data nationally and builds “geospatial heat maps” to “predict incident trends”, which appears to be a form of predictive policing.
The data throws new light on the department’s surveillance ambitions in the wake of the agency’s unprecedented $165bn funding boost in last year’s tax and spending bill, and controversies over agents’ apparent gathering of visual and biometric data on protesters in Minneapolis.
The data was gathered by a pseudonymous “cyber-hacktivist”, and provided to reporters by transparency nonprofit Distributed Denial of Secrets.
Although some of the data was already publicly available, the leak also exposed more than 6,000 companies that bid with the agency – not all of whom were funded for their projects – offering a window on the full scope of the private sector’s appetite for homeland security work, and the technologies the DHS considered but did not pursue.
Those parts of the data that were already public match the data provided in the leak.
The Guardian emailed the department a detailed request for comment. The Guardian also emailed the hacktivist for comment using an email included with the materials.
Jeramie Scott, a senior counsel and director of the Surveillance Oversight Project at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said: “It very much feels like sometimes these people are watching dystopian science fiction movies and thinking, ‘Oh, that looks good!’”
He added: “That’s not the lesson from dystopian science fiction. They’re taking the wrong lesson from it.”
The data
The OIP sits within DHS’s Science and Technology Directorate, managing programs including the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) initiative, which funnels federal money to small-to-medium enterprises to develop prototypes addressing specific technology needs.
The data as supplied to the Guardian consists of two structured databases: a registry of more than 6,800 companies that have bid with OIP, and a separate database of more than 1,400 funded contracts. Each contract record includes a proposal abstract written by the company, describing the technology it pitched to the DHS.
The SBIR program, mandated by Congress in 1982 and reauthorized in 2022, requires that proposals be evaluated in part on their “potential for commercial application”. The program was designed to ensure that publicly funded R&D produces self-sustaining businesses rather than one-off prototypes.
Contracts typically begin as phase I proof-of-concept awards of around $100,000-$175,000 before graduating to phase II prototype funding of $1m or more. The leaked data spans two decades of this pipeline, from 2004 to late 2025, covering more than 1,400 awarded contracts worth a combined $845m.
Biometrics
Contracts issued since Trump’s inauguration include several focused on enabling agents to harvest biometric data using cellphones.
On 7 May 2025, three contracts were issued for the development of these technologies, and all three promised to make them available beyond DHS.
Idea Mind LLC received $174,464 for a technology it calls Vibe, an adapter that connects fingerprint and iris scanners to phones via USB-C or Lightning, offering “plug-and-play compatibility with Android and iOS devices without requiring custom drivers”.
Intellisense Systems received $174,990 for its similar Flow device designed so that a phone and biometric scanner can be “handheld effectively as a single unit,” supporting “handheld fingerprint (4 slap) and iris peripherals, and face and contactless fingerprint capture using the phone’s camera”. Integrated Biometrics received $167,627 for Bios Link, and wrote that its technology would serve “DHS components, interagency stakeholders, non-federal entities, the intelligence community, and international mission partners”.
Intellisense was spun off from Physical Optics Corporation in 2018. Together the two companies have received 59 DHS research contracts worth more than $17m since 2004, according to the leaked data. Intellisense alone received three contracts on 7 May, including Flow and two other projects involving airport surveillance AI and video deepfake prevention. Like Intellisense, Integrated Biometrics, based in Spartanburg, South Carolina, is an established government contractor that manufactures FBI-certified fingerprint sensors and similar devices for law enforcement, military and government clients around the world.
Idea Mind LLC, based in a suburb of Columbus, Ohio, had no previous DHS contracting history.
ICE and CBP agents’ harvesting of biometric data and use of facial recognition technologies came into focus during DHS’s January “surge” into the city, after rightwing influencers highlighted longstanding allegations of childcare fraud in the city.
The Guardian contacted all three companies for comment.
Airport surveillance
Four further contracts awarded on 7 May, totaling $699,000, funded technologies for surveilling passengers approaching TSA airport security checkpoints.
All four use AI to analyze existing airport CCTV feeds and automatically catalog passengers’ physical characteristics. Intellisense’s Ossca system would “detect and track individuals; identify anthropometric characteristics, clothing articles, shoe types, and visible accessories” and which agencies can use to “automatically alert operators with flags and detailed reports for adjudication”.
The standalone behavior detection officer role was quietly eliminated in 2016-2017. An ACLU investigation found the program had been used for racial profiling at airports including Newark and Chicago.
DHS’s own earlier attempt at technology-assisted behavioral screening, the Fast program was quietly wound down in the wake of EPIC’s disclosures.
On Fast and its apparent successors, Scott, the EPIC counsel, said “not only is it highly unlikely to work, but there are issues in terms of the risk it creates, in its disproportionate impacts, in turning the state apparatus on people who haven’t done anything wrong, in the waste of money, and in the potential for those tools to be used to undermine democracy.”
Predictive Policing
Also on 7 May, three contracts totaling $524,000 were awarded for AI platforms that would ingest 911 call data, with one apparently promising to identify and predict crime patterns.
All three were awarded under the same DHS topic seeking tools to centralise and analyse data from the nation’s 5,000-plus 911 call centres.
The most far-reaching is Cimas, the Consolidated Incident Management Analytics System, built by a newly-registered firm, Cassius LLC.
Its proposal describes “a high-availability data lake integrated with AI-driven analytics” that would collect and anonymise 911 call and incident data from public safety answering points nationwide, generating “geospatial heat maps” and using AI models to “predict incident trends” and “deliver actionable insights to responders.”
Cassius LLC, based in Bangor, Maine has no previous DHS contracting history. Cassius’s website describes it as a utility IT consulting firm; it names no team members, and its “our team” page is non-functional.
The Brennan Center for Justice has described predictive policing as “tech-washing” that “gives racially biased policing methods the appearance of objectivity, simply because a computer or an algorithm seems to replace human judgment.” Leading police departments including Los Angeles and Chicago abandoned their predictive policing programs in 2019-20.
The Guardian emailed Cassius and Zachary Canders, listed as the firm’s partner in DHS documents and Maine company filings for further clarification of the proposed technology.
In an email response, Canders wrote to The Guardian: “Hey, that’s really great” adding: “Could you do me a favor? Let’s write a story about me taking your mom out to dinner. We have an amazing seafood buffet. Lots of laughs lots of hugs probably a few kisses, then I never call her back.”[SOURCE]
Saturday, March 29, 2025
DSSO_Righting (some of) The Wrongs: FBI whistleblowers who got punished during Biden's administration appeal their treatment under Trump
Carmine Sabia
March 29, 2025
FBI agents who say that they were punished after exposing wrongdoing in the department during the administration of former President Joe Biden are asking new FBI Director Kash Patel to review their cases.
In early March the group, Empower Oversight sent letter to Samuel Ramer, who serves as the FBI general counsel, in which is asked for assistance related to the alleged improper treatment of the whistleblowers, which included FBI agents and employees Garret O’Boyle, Marcus Allen, Stephen Friend, Zach Schofftsall, Monica Shillingburg, and Michael Zummer, Just The News reported.
Another four clients mentioned in the letter had their names redacted, including one who wants to share information on his time working under the infamous Peter Strzok.
One of the whistleblowers, staff operations specialist Marcus Allen, had his security clearance suspended “for questioning whether Director (Christopher) Wray had testified truthfully to Congress and other allegations based on SOS Allen’s political beliefs and concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine.”
The agent, who was assigned to the FBI’s Charlotte Division, “was suspended indefinitely without pay.”
The group said that the FBI reached a settlement with Allen but that it did not completely fulfill its obligations under the agreement. It said that the FBI still needs to fix its client’s W2 tax forms and pay him the correct amount of leave he is owed.
“While I feel vindicated now in getting back my security clearance, it is sad that in the country I fought for as a Marine, the FBI was allowed to lie about my loyalty to the U.S. for two years,” the formerly suspended agent said. “Unless there is accountability, it will keep happening to others. Better oversight and changes to security clearance laws are key to stop abuses suffered by whistleblowers like me.”
Empower Oversight wants a “fresh review” of his and other whistleblower cases as well.
“The actions taken against our clients were in reprisal for protected whistleblowing and/or improper targeting because of their political beliefs,” organization founder and chairman Jason Foster said in the letter to the FBI.
“The common theme among most of our clients who had their security clearances suspended and or revoked is the FBI’s ability to indefinitely delay the process and financially pressure FBI employees by suspending their pay and blocking their ability to earn a living any other way. Most facing that dilemma simply resign with no prospect of a fair process to challenge it, which allows the pattern to repeat without remedy,” he said.
The attorneys representing the FBI agents said that “if the review by your office alone does not lead to direct managerial action to remedy the harms and resolve our clients’ pending matters, we would be willing to propose to our clients that they enter into mediation facilitated by a neutral mediator — assuming an acceptable senior official with no animus toward our clients is delegated settlement authority to represent the FBI in the mediation.”
The group said that “while we appreciate your review of these cases to explore ways to amicably resolve and remedy the harms the FBI has inflicted on our clients, we are also willing to engage in other good faith efforts to reach the same goals.”
“A lot of our work has to remain confidential because some clients do not wish to become public figures. Sometimes though, it takes public scrutiny to move the needle,” Foster said when he spoke to Just the News.
“These FBI clients have waited a very long time on a system that, as of today, is still failing to keep its promises to protect whistleblowers from retaliation. It’s past time to make good on those promises and give them real meaning in these cases,” Foster added. [SOURCE]
Sunday, February 23, 2025
Friday, January 3, 2025
Monday, December 30, 2024
COVID TALES: We've All Been Lied To_Dr. Mike Yeadon, Former Phizer Vice President, admits that the Covid vax is designed to "harm, maim, and kill...and to reduce human fertility"
Former Pfizer Vice President Dr. Mike Yeadon drops a bombshell, claiming that the mRNA COVID "vaccines" were deliberately engineered to harm, disable, and kill, with the ultimate goal of reducing human fertility. pic.twitter.com/zUtQn6BaSI
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) December 27, 2024
Thursday, August 1, 2024
Kamala Harris_Don't Let Her Catch You Celebrating Christmas: How Dare We Wish Each Other Merry Christmas!
In 2017, Kamala Harris shrieked that Americans can't say "Merry Christmas" as long as illegal immigrants are being deported back to their home countries.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) August 1, 2024
Kamala has always openly been a shrill, America-last lunatic. pic.twitter.com/gAFoF18Mog
Wednesday, July 31, 2024
GOVERNMENT TODAY_When The White Man Went For Our Children: ‘Bidenbucks’ Plan Uses Native American School Children In Voter Registration Scheme

Image CreditThe White House / Youtube
Think the Biden administration isn’t using taxpayer-funded federal agencies to carry out a get-out-the-vote effort for Democrats? Take a look at what President Joe Biden’s constitutionally suspect executive order is doing at the U.S. Department of the Interior.
Email communications and other documents obtained by the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project through thousands of Freedom of Information Act requests show the Interior Department’s Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) feverishly scheming to use students in bureau-operated Native American K-12 schools to carry voter registration cards home to their parents. The agency oversees 183 schools on more than 60 Indian reservations in 23 states, according to BIE’s website. Some 46,000 students attend the schools.
Records also expose Biden’s secretary of the Interior, Deb Haaland, who “made history when she became the first Native American to serve as a cabinet secretary,” arguably stepping over the Hatch Act line that bars executive branch officials from engaging in overtly political activities on the job.
“What’s happening now is absolute corruption. A very red line was crossed by this administration,” Mike Howell, executive director of Heritage’s Oversight Project, told me on The Federalist Radio Hour podcast. “We’ve taken for granted in the United States of America that the president isn’t allowed to use the executive branch to ensure his own reelection. … The voters get to decide who the president is.”
‘Predatory in Nature’
As The Federalist has extensively reported, Biden signed Executive Order 14019 within the first month of his presidency. The innocuous-sounding “Promoting Access to Voting” executive order commands federal agencies to work with state government offices and leftist groups to register and mobilize traditionally left-leaning voters.
Howell asserts the GOTV effort is “predatory in nature” because it targets Democrat voters for mobilization, not all voters.
“It’s really ham-fisted how they’ve gone about this in their absolute desperation,” he said. “We’re seeing a huge uptick in Native American reservations, prisons, college campuses — any key demographic that is associated with the left is a target for the government to activate and to roll into the DNC’s get-out-the-vote program. They are wholly ignoring sort of any demographic that would traditionally lean right.”
Case in point, the U.S. Department of Interior’s proposed initiative to use elementary, junior high, and high school kids in their vote-delivery scheme.
‘Once Again Weaponizing’
“I’d be interested in your thoughts on this one. Department leadership is proposing having BIE send home voter registration cards with students to give to their parents,” Jennifer Segal Wiginton, a Bureau of Indian Education “team lead” in its Office of the Solicitor, wrote in a Feb. 24, 2022 email to Brian Quint, attorney-adviser at the Department of the Interior.
Like many of the communications turned over in the FOIA request, much of Wiginton’s email is redacted. An earlier email from Wiginton to her colleague Joshua Berg raises the funding question.
“I think the question is what source of federal funds, if any, is available for this purpose,” Wiginton wrote in the Feb. 15, 2022 email. She added she would be “happy to brainstorm further” with Berg, who served as attorney-advisor with the Division of Indian Affairs -Tribal Government Services at the time.
Department officials also discussed a plan to provide “return envelopes with pre-paid postage so that parents and/or guardians [could] mail in their completed voter registration applications directly to the corresponding elections office in their state.”
The funding question is very important, particularly because Congress never appropriated taxpayer dollars to operate a national get-out-the-vote campaign for Democrats, in Native American school systems or anywhere else. A lawsuit recently filed by the America First Policy Institute and the national law firm of Schaerr Jaffe LLP alleges the Biden administration is violating the Anti-Deficiency Act through Biden’s sweeping executive order. The act “prohibits money from being expended from the Treasury in excess of the amount appropriated by Congress through legislation for that item,” the lawsuit states.
“The Biden Administration is once again weaponizing federal agencies, this time to steer taxpayer resources to liberal activist groups who want to sway the election,” Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, one of several plaintiffs, said in a statement. “This is a cynical attempt to turn government agencies into a Democratic turnout machine, and it’s wrong. That’s why I’m joining this lawsuit and working to hold the administration accountable.”
Exactly what happened to the suggested plans is unclear. Department of the Interior officials did not return The Federalist’s multiple requests for comment.
‘Ambitious Expectations’
Another series of Department of the Interior emails shows the Bureau of Indian Education working on a plan to increase Native voting through registration drives at BIE postsecondary colleges and tribally controlled colleges — Haskell Indian Nations University in Lawrence, Kan., and Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute near Albuquerque.
“We’ve asked that you be added to a meeting with OPM [U.S. Office of Personnel Management] to discuss BIE funding various voting rights initiatives at Haskell and SIPI. You may well be in listen only mode, but given that the leadership has had some ambitious expectations as to BIE’s role in this process, we’re trying to keep the BIE team in the loop,” wrote Sam Ennis, an assistant solicitor in the Division of Indian Affairs, in a March 22, 2022 email to Wiginton and Quint.
A plan was included in the records disclosed but, again, mostly redacted. It noted “top five actions or activities,” including “assisting the public with voter registration, mail ballots and other aspects of voting.” Also included, a section on “Legal Issues By State — in those states which we decide to allow BIE schools act [sic] as a repository for applications and then submit on behalf of parents (following rules for voter registration agencies as a precaution).”
Howell, from the Heritage Oversight Project, said the records obtained show the federal agency “basically picking Indian reservations only in deep blue areas.”
“They’re picking the hardest left demographics in the swing states and doing things as loony as sending kids home with packets to give their parents to fill out,” the election integrity expert said. “They’re enlisting the children to go after the parents. It’s just really, really predatory.”
‘Using Their Official Authority’
Documents also show the Department of the Interior running up against an 85-year-old federal law aimed at preventing “pernicious political activities.”
Heather Gottry, a “designated agency ethics official” in the solicitor’s office, was charged with dealing with vetting the GOTV language in official remarks and speeches. In an email dated June 14, 2022, Gottry notes the involvement of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel in making sure Interior Secretary Deb Haaland’s voting pep rally speech and column comport with the Hatch Act. The law bars executive branch employees, with the exception of the president and vice president, from overt political activities while on the job.
While permissible for an Interior employee to make public remarks highlighting the agency’s efforts to formally designate the Department-operated colleges as voter registration agencies, “OSC has advised that it is not permissible under the Hatch Act to do so in a way that appears that the federal employee is using their official authority or influence to interfere with or affect the result of an election, by showing support for or opposition to a political party or candidate,” the bureaucrat wrote.
She warned that, “ty[ing] GOTV language to an official issue or advocacy on an issue… raises concerns about whether they are using their official authority or influence to encourage those listening to the speech to vote for candidates who share same viewpoints.” OSC advised that “the inclusion of GOTV language in official remarks/speeches should not be targeted to specific demographic or other groups…”
After proposing edits and comments, the legal team signed off on the secretary’s remarks, redacted in the email. Haaland’s op-ed, published in her official capacity, targeted a Native American audience — and seemed to trip over the Hatch Act line. The op-ed, headlined “Our ancestors survived against all odds, we owe it to them to vote,” reeked of progressive politics.
“Recent attempts such as closing certain polling locations, limiting early voting, changing polling location hours, and even drawing maps to hush the voices of specific populations are consistent attempts to restrict voting access,” the secretary complained, painting election integrity laws with a far-left brush.
“With President Biden’s support, we are working with states to expand access to voting at Department of the Interior-operated post-secondary Tribal institutions. In May, I was proud to announce that Haskell Indian Nations University (Haskell) in Kansas and the Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute (SIPI) in New Mexico will be designated voter registration agencies under the National Voter Registration Act. This action seeks to remove barriers to voting by allowing these institutions to facilitate voter registration opportunities for enrolled students and members of those communities.”
Another Biden administration endorsement for Bidenbucks and the party that created the questionable executive order. The biased review comes as federal agencies refuse to turn over relevant and unredacted documents to government watchdog organizations — and Congress.
Howell’s confidence in a free and fair election in November is dwindling “because of things like Bidenbucks or what we’re calling Kamala Campaign Cash, or things like trying to imprison your chief political opponent or, you know, shooting him in the face,” he said. “This election has been interfered with in so many substantial ways that there is a delta that President Trump will have to overcome.” [SOURCE]
2024 Presidential Election_Ma', We Hardly Knew Ya': The Case Of NFL Star Kelce Family Mother And Her Criticism Of Anyone Offended At Paris Opener As "Homophobic"
Perry Knotts/Getty ImagesWarner Todd Huston
Kansas City Chiefs star Travis Kelce’s mother, Donna, is taking heat for sharing a Facebook post that claims you are a “homophobe” for criticizing the 2024 Olympics ceremony.
The mother of the Super Bowl winner re-posted a Facebook post by user Jeff Rose, who claimed that the opening ceremony was not a depiction of the famed Christian painting, “The Last Supper,” but was instead a depiction of “a Greek Dionysus Feast celebration.” The post goes on to falsely characterize the Greek god Dionysus as one of the gods to whom the Greeks dedicated the Olympics and also says Dionysus is “also known as Bacchus,” even though Bacchus was the Roman version of Dionysus, not the Greek version.
Despite garbling the history, the post accuses opponents of the opening ceremony of being historically illiterate. But it also accuses the critics of hating gays, writing, “However, because of your veiled homophobia, some of you can’t discern factual information,” Fox News reported.
The original poster has since turned off comments on the post.
Kelce seems to have shared the post without making any comments on the matter.
The ceremony, which kicked off with a filmed segment showing a bisexual threesome preparing to engage in sex and numerous gay dancers, went on to feature a transgender fashion show along a catwalk. On one side of the catwalk, though, millions of viewers were shocked when they saw what appeared to be a depiction of “The Last Supper” featuring gay and transgender models in place of Jesus and his disciples.
The Olympics later delivered an official apology of sorts over the opening ceremony and also deleted the video from its YouTube account.
According to some reports, the Paris games are being so ill-received that organizers are offering tourists bargain basement prices on tickets just to get someone in the seats during the events. [SOURCE]
Tuesday, July 30, 2024
Monday, July 29, 2024
Saturday, July 27, 2024
JW TRUTH BOMB_Where Identity Politics Leads You To: What defines you?
Because we've adopted primary identities based on our sexual and political preferences rather than our identity in Christ. We wake up everyday trying to prove how heterosexual, homosexual, conservative, liberal, black, Dem, Repub we are. We prove our Christianity for 90 minutes… https://t.co/pAfi8fEKyf
— Jason Whitlock (@WhitlockJason) July 27, 2024
Wednesday, July 24, 2024
AMERICA TODAY_Stomping an Asian player's head into the ground during a school basketball game in the Bay area, CA
NEW: 13-year-old basketball player stomps on an opponent's head during a Bay Area game
— Unlimited L's (@unlimited_ls) July 23, 2024
The game happened on Sunday at the College of Alameda against Payton's Place, another Bay Area team
“He was down on the floor and this kid just came and just stomped on him and on his head”… pic.twitter.com/FvDupfSiOx
Monday, June 13, 2011
Barry As President: Unable To Make A Moral Call, White House Won't Say Weiner Should Resign

Remember how easily it was for Barry to make a judgement on the entire police department of Cambride, Mass, and how "stupidly" they acted? Even more time for review has elapsed in the Weiner scandal case than was allowed the Cambridge Police Dept in the Henry Gates case, but poor little Barry seems paralyzed with fear to make a smilar judgement about Weiner's actions.
A White House spokesman said Monday that Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) is a "distraction" from important issues, but he stopped short of calling for Weiner's resignation.
White House press secretary Jay Carney, who refused to comment on the scandal last week, said Monday that "the president feels, we feel at the White House this is a distraction."
"As Congressman Weiner has said himself, his behavior was inappropriate, dishonesty was inappropriate," Carney said, briefing reporters aboard Air Force One. "But the president is focused on his job, which is getting this economy continuing to grow, creating jobs and ensuring the safety and security of the American people."
Several senior Democrats including Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), and Democratic Campaign Congressional Chairman Steve Israel (D-N.Y.), called on Weiner to resign over the weekend.
When pressed on whether Obama would like to see Weiner resign, Carney demurred.
"I answered that question," Carney said. "We think it's a distraction from the important business that this president needs to conduct and Congress need to conduct. Beyond that I don't have any more comment."
Weiner entered a rehab facility over the weekend and has requested a leave of absence from the House while he seeks treatment.
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Cloward-Piven Strategy: Obama's Undeclared War on America
The Cloward-Piven Strategy
Republican US House Speaker John Boehner, and US Senate Foreign Relations Committee ranking minority member Richard Lugar, are both obsessed with bringing President Obama to account under the War Powers Act for his intervention in Libya.
Libya is typical of Obama's foreign policy: timid, tardy, aloof, and counterproductive. Accordingly, the outcome from Obama's Libyan humanitarian adventure has been predictable, needlessly adding over $1 billion to the US federal deficit while emboldening a stalemate benefitting Gaddafi, who continues to inflict civilian casualties with impunity.
Whatever Obama's disposition of the War Powers Act concerning Libya, it is still trivial stuff compared with Obama's undeclared War on America. Boehner and Lugar need to stand down from the snipe hunt over Libya and pay attention to Obama's destruction here at home.
Obama's undeclared War on America has been as intense, unrelenting, costly, and devastating as any undeclared war since Korea. Obama's carpet-bombing through taxes, regulations, energy policies, and pledging to do more of the same has paralyzed and bankrupted the nation, plunging it into a despondency not seen since eight decades ago.
Apart from James Buchanan, no president has been so ill-prepared and willfully ignorant as Obama when presented with an unprecedented national crisis. We are now mired in the 21st century Great Gloom, our nation's 2nd Great Depression, having identical features with the first one: millions of Americans are out of work with few prospects for any; millions more Americans have lost their homes with even more facing foreclosure and owing more on their mortgages than the homes are worth; the private sector is calcified; high taxes and regulations frustrate capital formation and job creation.
Obama's inability or unwillingness to read history, compounded by his stubborn big government ideology, has led him to adopt or advocate for the single most devastating tactic that doomed Herbert Hoover when the Great Depression began and plagued FDR as the wretchedness of the 1930s persisted for nearly another decade: higher taxes.
The Great Depression's illiquidity closed thousands of banks, wiped out savings, and obliterated home and farm ownership. High tariffs choked international trade, idling more businesses and spoiling more stockpiles of foodstuffs.
Today's analog -- regulatory fever -- has strangled job creation, demolished the real estate markets, and crushed any hope to restore self-confidence by heaping nearly $2 trillion of unrelieved costs on American business.
Except for taxes and tariffs -- as David M. Kennedy argues in his Freedom From Fear-The American People in Depression and War 1929-1945, at least President Herbert Hoover didn't deliberately make the Depression worse. Hoover was physically exhausted and mentally drained in tirelessly applying any remedy that would ease the suffering and stop the economic bleeding.
Says Kennedy ( p. 94) "He kept up a punishing regimen of rising at six and working without interruption until nearly midnight. His clothes were disheveled, his hair rumpled, his eyes bloodshot, complexion ashen.
"By the fall of 1932 he had lost all stomach for political campaigning...seemed to campaign more for vindication of the historical record than for the affection in the hearts of voters.
"Just four years earlier he had won one of the most lopsided victories in the history of presidential elections...The Great Engineer, so recently the most revered American, was the most loathed and scorned figure in the country."
Contrast that scene with Obama on another golf outing, wolfing down chilidogs and cheeseburgers, and launching his 2012 re-election campaign eighteen months in advance.
Hoover gets a bum rap for allowing a recession to turn into the Great Depression. He tried everything at his disposal that contemporaneous economists and banker/financiers thought would work. But as Kennedy further observes, through the lens of economist Herbert Stein, the federal government at the time was too small to be leveraged; state and local governments had collective budgets five times larger than the federal government and some states had statutory restrictions on incurring more indebtedness. According to Kennedy, even Pennsylvania by its own constitution could not borrow more than $1 million.
The federal budget in 1929 was only 3% of GDP. Obama's 2012 budget would approach 25% of GDP. Obama sees no limit to bloated bureaucracies, the size of government tenfold larger and growing even more immense than Hoover could ever have imagined, and the debt to go with it flirting with sovereign default.
In the beginning Hoover, not gregarious by nature, engaged every politician and business leader who he thought could be enlisted for advice or action. Only after exhausting all possibilities, while the nation's fortunes plummeted further, did Hoover become isolated and withdrawn. Kennedy relates a dark joke circulating at the lowest point of Hoover's presidency: "the president asked for a nickel to make a telephone call to a friend, an aide flipped him a dime and said 'call them both'."
Hoover was a man of broad and deep intellect, a voracious student of economics and finance. Kennedy (p 94) recounts a quote from Theodore Joslin, a secretary to Hoover:
His was a mathematical brain...Let banking officials for example come into his office and he would rattle off the number of banks in the country, list their liabilities and assets, describe the trend of fiscal affairs, and go into the liquidity or lack of it, of individual institutions, all from memory.
What a contrast to Obama's teleprompter presidency, uttering shopworn political clichés with it, occasionally unable to string together anything coherent without it.
Prior to becoming president, Hoover was regarded as the most experienced organization titan, ironically owing to his single-handed leadership in the acclaimed Belgian food relief program upon the outset of WWI. As Kennedy notes, at the end of the War, Hoover was President Wilson's personal advisor, "as much as any one man could he got the credit for reorganizing the war-shattered European economy."
Yes, Hoover is tagged with failure. Yet he was serious, purposeful, and above all, even willing to abandon his own ideology in search for a cure. Hoover's acquiescence to the formation of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation capped a sequence of measures harnessing the potential power of government intervention when it was clear private means were insufficient. In fact, as Kennedy continues, noted Columbia University economist Rexford Tugwell, FDR's behind-the-scenes architect for much of the New Deal, "later conceded that practically the whole New Deal was extrapolated from programs that Hoover started[.]"
Obama shares but two likenesses with Hoover. The first one in public utterances prone to underestimating the severity of the crisis.
Remarked Hoover in his famous understatement in May 1930, "I am convinced we have passed the worst and with continued effort we shall rapidly recover...the depression is over[.]" Last week we heard from Obama that "the economy is taking a while to mend...and faces bumps on the road to recovery."
Hoover's comments were accidents of timing, Obama's deliberate obfuscations.
And second, not unlike Hoover's (and later FDR's) addiction to tax hikes, Obama has overseen piles of costs heaped on everyday Americans from deliberately high energy prices to environmental regulatory roadblocks on energy production to $1 trillion in taxes and mandates under ObamaCare.
Who can objectively deny Obama has made the extant condition worse? Whether he has purposefully made things worse is up for some debate; after all he has no expertise in anything from which to conjure a sinister plan. Yet economic destruction derived from ignorance, folly, and neglect is still destruction. At least Hoover, by contrast, was a self-made economist who understood capital formation and liquidity, monetary and fiscal theory, and international trade, debt, and currency flows.
Arguably, international isolationism contributed to and prolonged the Great Depression. Obama's own personal isolationism, evidenced by his contempt for regular Americans and standoffish relations with foreign leaders, handmaiden to the scorn and hostility he shows towards Republicans, is a continual roadblock in finding solutions.
Even Obama's own erstwhile cheerleader for doomed Obamanomics, Austan Goolsbee, chief economic advisor to the president, has found either the task overwhelming or the companionship insufferable -- take your pick -- after only 10 months on the job.
Temperamentally Obama is a drone unleashing as much destruction on the American psyche as his drones have done to destroy military targets in Afghanistan. Devoid of honest analytics, Obama continues to issue phony reports from the domestic battlefront. Even the Washington Post, fiercely loyal to Obama's personality and politics, has had enough of his lies about the success from the auto industry bailouts.
If Obama's game is to perfect an undeclared War on America, he is succeeding. It remains to be seen whether the Republicans can summon enough nerve to reprise Gen McAuliffe's famous retort to the German demand for surrender at Bastogne in December of 1944, "Nuts."
Only Congress can now do what the voters sent them to do -- disarm and defund Obama's undeclared War on America. And for 2012, who shall be the Republicans' Gen Patton, coming to America's rescue?(source)
Friday, February 4, 2011
FRANCES FOX PIVEN And The "Orchestrated Crisis" Strategy

Piven and her late husband, Columbia social-work professor Richard Cloward, are best known for having outlined, in 1966, the so-called Cloward-Piven Strategy – a tactic which seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading government bureaucracies with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into "a profound financial and political crisis" that would unleash "powerful forces … for major economic reform at the national level."
In 1966 Piven was a panel member at a Socialist Scholars Conference in New York. There, she and her husband presented a paper proposing that the poor should engage in "irregular and disruptive tactics" designed to overburden city and state governments with demands for welfare money – the ultimate objective being to force those governments to turn to the federal government for assistance. Such “disruption of the system,” said Piven, would result in a situation where:
“Welfare rolls will begin to go up; welfare payments will begin to go up – the impact will be very, very sharp. The mounting welfare budget will increase taxes, force cities to turn to the federal government. We have to help people to make claims; for this they will organize and act."
Beginning in 1967, Piven served as an advisor to the newly formed National Welfare Rights Organization.
In their 1977 book, Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail, Piven and Cloward reemphasized that because the poor and unemployed were politically powerless in America, they would be well advised to withhold “quiescence in civil life: they can riot.” The authors stated, approvingly, that in the 1930s, violent disruptions such as “mob looting” and “rent riots” – fomented by leftist and Communist-party organizers – had enabled the first great expansion of the welfare state to take place. Likewise, Cloward and Piven credited the urban riots of the 1960s for helping to further grow the welfare state by forcing changes in traditional procedures for investigating and verifying applicants’ eligibility for welfare benefits.
In 1979-80, Piven served as a “lecturer on U. S. political activities” with the Institute for Policy Studies.
In October 1983 Piven was a New York delegate to a conference of the newly formed Democratic Socialists of America. In subsequent years, she served on DSA's Feminist Commission. To this day, she remains an honorary DSA chair.
In 1983 Piven and Cloward co-founded Human SERVE, an organization that sought to register voters at social-service agencies and Departments of Motor Vehicles. Piven's hope was that federal and state governments would eventually try to rein in the efforts of politicized welfare workers who were registering new voters, and that this, in turn, would cause welfare recipients to rise up in a massive protest movement -- rendering society “disrupted and transformed.”
That same year, Piven delivered the opening remarks at the Socialist Scholars Conference (SSC) in New York City, an event that was likely attended by a young Barack Obama. The conference commemorated the 100-year anniversary of Karl Marx’s death. Piven described Marx as the man whose ideas had enabled “common people” around the globe to become “historical actors.” She urged her listeners to “stand within the intellectual and political tradition Marx bequeathed,” treating it not as a “dead inheritance” but rather as a “living tradition—the creation of thinking, active people.” In subsequent years, Piven would appear at numerous additional SSCs.
In the fall of 1994, a publication of the pro-socialist New Party (NP) listed Piven among the more than 100 activists “who are building the NP.” Other notable names on the list were John Cavanagh, Noam Chomsky, Barbara Ehrenreich, Randall Forsberg, Maude Hurd, Manning Marable, Zach Polett, Wade Rathke, Mark Ritchie, Gloria Steinem, Cornel West, Quentin Young, and Howard Zinn.
In 1996, Piven was one of the 130 individuals who played key roles in founding the Campaign for America's Future. Among the other notables were Mary Frances Berry, Julian Bond, Heather Booth, Robert Borosage, John Cavanagh, Richard Cloward, Peter Dreier, Barbara Ehrenreich, Betty Friedan, Todd Gitlin, Tom Hayden, Denis Hayes, Roger Hickey, Patricia Ireland, Jesse Jackson, Joseph Lowery, Robert Reich, Mark Ritchie, Arlie Schardt, Susan Shaer, Andrew Stern, John Sweeney, and Richard Trumka.
On September 20, 2001, Piven was a guest speaker at a New York City gathering to honor the work of her husband, Richard Cloward, who had died a month earlier. Other speakers included Barbara Ehrenreich, Howard Zinn, June Jordan, Gus Newport, Tim Sampson, Joel Rogers, Miles Rappaport, and Cornel West.
In January 2002, Piven endorsed the founding of War Times, a national anti-Iraq War newspaper established by a group of San Francisco leftists affiliated with such organizations as STORM, the National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, and the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights. Among the more prominent founders of the publication was Van Jones. Along with Piven, key individual and organizational endorsers of War Times included Phyllis Bennis, Paul Buhle, Noam Chomsky, Kathleen Cleaver, Winona LaDuke, Tim Wise, Howard Zinn, the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, and Students for Justice in Palestine.
In August 2004, Piven endorsed a New York City demonstration at the site of the Republican National Convention in New York, protesting President George W. Bush's “endless war and repression.” The rally was organized by Not In Our Name, a project of the Revolutionary Communist Party. Fellow endorsers of the event included Ed Asner, Medea Benjamin, Eve Ensler, Danny Glover, Tom Hayden, C. Clark Kissinger, Barbara Lubin, Michael Parenti, Rev. George Regas, Leonard Weinglass, Howard Zinn, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, Code Pink, the Freedom Socialist Party, Vietnam Veterans Against the War, and the Women's International League for Peace & Freedom.
During 2006-07, Piven served as president of the American Sociological Association.
On December 22, 2010, Piven published an article in The Nation titled "Mobilizing the Jobless," where, after noting that some 15 million Americans were unemployed, she asked: “So where are the angry crowds, the demonstrations, sit-ins and unruly mobs?” Admonishing the Left not to wait patiently for “the end of the American empire and even the end of neoliberal capitalism,” she called for active measures to bring about “big new [government] initiatives in infrastructure and green energy.” Such measures, she explained, should take the form of “mass protests” that could pressure President Obama “hard from his base.” Piven urged that the disruptions begin on the local and state levels, where governments that were “strapped for funds” would look, by necessity, for “federal action” to help them. Wrote Piven:
“An effective movement of the unemployed will have to look something like the strikes and riots that have spread across Greece in response to the austerity measures forced on the Greek government by the European Union, or like the student protests that recently spread with lightning speed across England in response to the prospect of greatly increased school fees.”
Before the unemployed or any other disadvantaged group “can mobilize for collective action,” added Piven, “they have to develop a proud and angry identity and a set of claims that go with that identity. They have to go from being hurt and ashamed to being angry and indignant …. [A] kind of psychological transformation has to take place; the out-of-work have to stop blaming themselves for their hard times and turn their anger on the bosses, the bureaucrats or the politicians who are in fact responsible.”
As of January 2011, Piven was a sponsor of New Politics, a self-described “independent socialist forum.” Other sponsors included Stanley Aronowitz, Derrick Bell, Paul Buhle, Noam Chomsky, Michael Eric Dyson, Barbara Ehrenreich, Jesse Lemisch, and Cornel West. The late Howard Zinn had previously been a sponsor.
In addition to Poor People's Movements, Piven has authored such books as: Regulating the Poor (1972, co-authored with Richard Cloward); Why Americans Don't Vote (1988); The War at Home (2004); Challenging Authority: How Ordinary People Change America (2008), and Keeping Down the Black Vote (2009). (source)



