Saturday, July 27, 2024

Kamala Harris_Beliefs On Parade: The NIAC speech

WORLD TODAY_Do Not Ask For Whom The Bell Tolls: If you won't believe your own Americans when they say this, will you believe the enlightened Europeans?

AMERICA TODAY: Gavin's Lurch Towards Climate Panic Fails: The case of a Climate Change Wildfire that wasn't

DSSO_The DOJ Protects The Deep State: Merrick Garland rewards FBI agents $2 million for trying to derail Trump Presidency using taxpayer-owned devices

 

The Justice Department has agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle privacy-invasion claims from Peter Strzok, seen here at a 2018 House hearing. Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

The Justice Department has agreed to pay a total of $2 million to settle legal claims brought by former FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok and former FBI attorney Lisa Page over the DOJ’s release of text messages the pair exchanged.

The agreement ends a lawsuit Page brought, but does not fully resolve Strzok’s separate suit, allowing him to continue to press his claims that he was fired in order to please then-President Donald Trump.

On Friday, Strzok’s lawyers announced his $1.2 million agreement as attorneys for both sides notified a federal judge in Washington that the privacy-focused portion of that dispute was resolved.

“This outcome is a critical step forward in addressing the government’s unfair and highly politicized treatment of Pete,” Strzok attorney Aitan Goelman said in a statement. “As important as it is for him, it also vindicates the privacy interests of all government employees. We will continue to litigate Pete’s constitutional claims to ensure that, in the future, public servants are protected from adverse employment actions motivated by partisan politics.”

Page, who resigned amid the controversy, settled her own Privacy Act claim with the department Friday. Copies of the settlement agreements for Strzok and Page obtained by POLITICO indicate Page is to receive $800,000. The documents state that the U.S. government is not admitting or conceding legal liability.

“The evidence was overwhelming that the release of text messages to the press in December 2017 was for partisan political purposes and was against the law,” Page’s lawyer, Amy Jeffress, said in a statement.

“While I have been vindicated by this result, my fervent hope remains that our institutions of justice will never again play politics with the lives of their employees,” Page added.

Strzok and Page became the target of Trump’s fury soon after the texts became public, showing the two officials disparaging Trump and his supporters. The pair discussed efforts to “stop” Trump from becoming president and characterized aspects of their work as an “insurance policy.”

Trump also harbored suspicion about the two because of their roles in the early stages of the FBI’s investigation into his 2016 presidential campaign’s links to Russia. Trump spent years mocking Strzok and Page in crude terms over their relationship and contending their text messages bolstered claims that the Russia investigation was politically motivated.

Strzok and Page have denied those allegations, saying their private political opinions did not influence their work on FBI matters, and many comments quoted by GOP lawmakers and the press were misconstrued.

During a House hearing in 2018, Strzok said the message about stopping Trump “was written late at night, off-the-cuff, and it was in response to a series of events that included then-candidate Trump insulting the immigrant family of a fallen war hero, and my presumption, based on that horrible, disgusting behavior that the American population would not elect somebody demonstrating that behavior to be president of the United States.”

Justice Department officials shared the messages with journalists on the evening of Dec. 12, 2017, as copies of them were being delivered to Congress in response to requests from committees there.

Depositions taken during the litigation indicated the release was approved by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who said he hoped sharing the messages with reporters would avoid the most inflammatory messages being taken out of context by lawmakers. Top career officials confirmed they approved the release.

Rosenstein declined to comment on the settlements Friday.

A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment on why the agency agreed to the payments.

However, at a House hearing last month, following indications that tentative settlements had been reached, Republicans pressed Attorney General Merrick Garland about why taxpayer money was going to flow to Strzok and Page.

“We reached settlements based on our litigators’ assessment of whether we can win the case and how much it will cost if we lose the case,” Garland said. “The Privacy Act doesn’t distinguish between people we like and people we don’t like, information we like and information we don’t like. If somebody in the government discloses personal information protected by the Privacy Act, that’s the way the law is.”

“So, you can go after a president and you get rewarded for doing so, according to the Justice Department?” House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) replied.

“It’s not a question of reward. It’s a question of the government paying for violating the law,” Garland answered.

The partial settlement in Strzok’s suit contains a provision that any damages he may be awarded in the remaining part of his lawsuit will be reduced by $200,000 as a result of the $1.2 million payment he is to receive. Neither Page nor Strzok can seek an additional award of legal fees for the claims settled Friday. [SOURCE]

Kamala Harris_Always The Good Little Communist: The Great Leap Forward To Equity

2024 Presidential Election_Doesn't Every American Patriot Go Into Business With CCP Spy-Balloon Outfits?: The Curious Story of Mark Kelly

 

      Photo: Courtesy of World View Enterprises

Feb 27, 2023
By

An Arizona company that manufactures and operates high-altitude surveillance balloons, and contracts with the federal government, faces renewed attention in the aftermath of the destruction of a spy balloon sent by the Chinese government that entered U.S. airspace earlier this month.

  • As recently as seven years ago, the company secured funds from Chinese investors.

Context: Tucson-based World View, cofounded by now-U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly in 2012, received venture capital from Tencent — among the largest tech companies in China — both in 2013 and 2016.

  • Tencent, like most Chinese tech giants, has close ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
  • Yes, but: World View president and CEO Ryan Hartman told The Arizona Republic in 2020 that Tencent had "zero access, zero input and zero control" over the company.

Of note: When Tencent made its investments, World View was mostly focused on space tourism. Tencent says it stopped investing after the Arizona company pivoted to a defense-oriented business.

  • Today, World View contracts with the U.S. government and private companies to provide aerial surveillance via balloon.
  • About 65% of the company's work last year was "defense related," Hartman told Breaking Defense.
  • The Pentagon's Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency examined World View in 2019 and cleared the company to handle military work, The Republic reported.

State of play: A high-altitude balloon sent by the Chinese government was downed by an American fighter aircraft off the coast of South Carolina in early February. The U.S. government believes it was being used for surveillance purposes.

Why it matters: That event escalated tensions between the U.S. and China and raised concerns over Chinese government surveillance and influence in American businesses.

  • Claire Chu, senior China analyst at defense intelligence company Janes, tells Axios Phoenix the balloon provides an opportunity to more carefully examine Chinese holdings in critical U.S. industries, including Tencent's investment in World View.
  • "It's just not a good look to have one of the largest Chinese investors, a Chinese company that's involved in a lot of critical technologies back home, involved in potential U.S. surveillance capabilities here," she says.

What they're saying: National security and global economic experts told us Tencent's investment in World View was "odd" but not necessarily cause for concern.

  • American Enterprise Institute researcher Derek Scissors tells us many Chinese companies invested in seemingly random U.S. entertainment and tourism businesses around 2016 in an attempt to move money out of China.
  • "We have a very small stake in the company, with no board seat or investment rights," Tencent said in a statement to Axios. "We invested when the business model focused on space tourism. Once the business shifted, we stopped investing and no longer have any active communications with the company."

 

Photo: Courtesy of World View Enterprises

Mark Kelly speaks during a campaign event in Phoenix on Nov. 2. Photo: Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images

Zoom out: Kelly stopped working with World View in 2019, ahead of his first Senate run.

  • In 2021, he placed his World View stock, worth at least $100,000, in a blind trust, according to federal financial disclosure documents.
  • "As a combat veteran, he's proud of the critical role that Arizona plays in developing technologies in partnership with our military to keep our country safe," Jacob Peters, a spokesperson for Kelly, told us of the senator's involvement.

Flashback: In 2014, former World View CEO Jane Poynter told Chinese news outlet Pengpai that Kelly met with Tencent USA head David Wallerstein and "introduced space tourism technology to him," Poynter said. "David was very interested and willing to invest at this stage" after speaking with Kelly, according to the article translated from Chinese.

  • In 2020, Kelly told The Arizona Republic, "I had a very brief conversation with one individual [from Tencent] that lasted about 30 seconds, maybe a minute.”

The big picture: Chinese investment in the U.S. exploded in 2016, after the Chinese government allowed its businesses to seek more outside investments, Mark Witzke of Rhodium Group tells Axios.

  • Investment dropped again in 2018 after China reversed its policies, the U.S. increased regulation of international investment and the geopolitical relationship between the two countries grew strained.

By the numbers: Chinese companies invested more than $85 billion in American businesses between 2016 and 2017, more than the previous 15 years combined, per Rhodium Group data. Fast-forward and investments dropped as low as $5.8 billion in 2021.

  • Reality check: These numbers are low, including only transactions in which a Chinese company took at least a 10% stake in a U.S. company. Many smaller investments are kept private.
  • For instance, Tencent's World View investments are not included in these numbers and became known only because the companies willingly disclosed the partnership.

Zoom in: Tencent began investing in U.S. companies before 2016, acquiring California-based esports company Riot Games in 2011, and has continued to invest even after regulatory crackdowns.

But, but, but: Scrutiny of Tencent's prolific investing, especially as it pertains to national security infrastructure, is not without merit, Chu said.

What to watch: Last month, World View entered into a reverse merger agreement that'll allow it to go public with an estimated enterprise value of $350 million.

  • As such, it will be required to reveal more information about its investors, but won't necessarily have to share details about past deals, like the one with Tencent, Scissors noted.  [SOURCE]

 

 

Kamala Harris_When Even The Smartest Leftists Can Smell The Difference: "Back before liberals decided that was a bad thing", says Bill Maher

 

Friday, July 26, 2024

2024 Presidential Election_The Leftist Lurch Of Drudge Continues: When saying you would try to help save targetted slaughter of babies means you're for tracking citizens


 

COVID TALES_Once The Mocker, Now The Victim?: Matt Driscoll Drops Dead Unexpectedly At 43

                                           Credit: The News Tribune


Matt Driscoll, a 43-year-old columnist and opinion editor for The News Tribune (TNT), died unexpectedly at his Tacoma home this Sunday.

Driscoll’s death was announced by his news network.

“We’ve lost a friend and beloved colleague, but Tacoma and Pierce County have lost someone who never stopped caring,” said fellow TNT writer Sean Robinson.

Washington Governor Jay Inslee (D-WA) also paid tribute to Driscoll on social media.

“Tacoma still has the Rainiers and the Narrows Bridge, but our City of Destiny has a hole in our hearts at the loss of Matt Driscoll. What a big heart and an insightful pen he gave us. I miss him already,” wrote Inslee.

Driscoll described himself as “the Johnny Appleseed of White Guilt” and/or “the Perez Hilton of Pierce County” on his social media accounts, according to My Northwest.

TNT senior reporter Shea Johnson remembered him as approachable and down-to-earth. “He was obviously a force at The News Tribune — the face of the TNT for many — but never acted like he was too cool to approach for questions, advice or just office banter,” Johnson said.

Driscoll reportedly suffered an apparent medical emergency from which he could not be revived. The official cause of death is yet to be determined, according to TNT.

It was reported that he had received a COVID-19 vaccination.

In recent times, Driscoll had been vocal about NFL star Aaron Rodgers’ controversial views on COVID-19 vaccines. He accused Rodgers of engaging in “performance art” after the latter warned people about potential side effects of mRNA vaccines.

Rogers “repeated popular conspiracy theories about Covid vaccines, cited a number of discredited sources and claimed he was being ‘cancelled’ and ‘censored’ for ‘doing his own research.’”

I swear to god: It’s like performance art at this point. https://t.co/izr3MqysLG

— Matt Driscoll (@mattsdriscoll) January 11, 2024

According to popular X account, ‘Died Suddenly’, “Driscoll also cheered the work of pro-vaxx troll Craig Egan in 2017, while he harassed and bullied the Vaxxed movie tour, which compellingly presented the story of parents whose children developed autism after receiving routine shots after birth.”

 

 

 

Kamala Harris_When the prettier girl wins: the case of Tulsi Gabbard Owning Harris in a Live Presidential Debate