New AG Holder Calls Whites Cowards

"Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards." (source)

We can't have a conversation about race because of the built-in damage done by the Democrat Party. Imagine trying to converse sincerely with a person who is filled with hate and rage because they realize how deficient they are compared to the person across the table from them. After all, for several generations of Black America, the Democrat Party has been telling them that "you can't do it on your own", and that "you need for us set up different standards for you to succeed."

If we were allowed to speak freely on the weekends, in public, we would say things like, "I'm tired of affirmative action for people who still hate my race", but immediately we would be told by the pc police that "that isn't being productive".

We would say, "Why do I, as a White Southern Male, have to stand in the back of the hiring line behind all of the affirmative action hires?" And then some self-appointed, smug liberal would say, "Now you know what it feels like to have been treated the way African Americans have been treated", even though there isn't a black alive today who was treated badly by ME. So why do I need to be taught a lesson?

So where can the conversation go from there? We have sincere feelings about harmony and right behavior, but are constantly told to stifle.

Do you know how hard it is to have a sincere conversation with all of the double standards that stand between us? Blacks have had so many rules bent for them in the American society that the rest of us don't know where to begin.

You see, when white people have a family member that gets pregnant at 14, we have the emotions of shame and regret that dominate our conversations: "How could you have done that, Debbie? We taught you better than that", and so on, so forth.

The sincere emotions that we express with our own kind are seen as racist and intolerant if we were to expect the same to be said to an African American. We have been told for a couple of generations now that our emotions and expectations out of ourselves is "living in a white world", by the leaders of the African American community.

Well, when you tell people like us whites something like that, we're actually embarrassed. We look hard at ourselves and try to correct what came from the black accuser. We don't suddenly get our back up at a person and try to "flip the script" on them. We actually try to self-improve, and avoid that kind of sentiment from coming up again.

So the conversation dies there.

Meanwhile, we try to teach our young the same principles that another segment of our population doesn't take as seriously. Years go by, kids grow up to become the next generation, and the problem continues to grow.

Today, African Americans commit 70% illegitimacy in their community. White Americans are at 29% illegitimacy.

It's hard to have a conversation on the weekends when every effort you've made to be good to the African American community is thrown back in your face as "racism".

If we let you go to your own schools for an education, we're told that we're racists because we graduate more people than your schools do.

If we force bussing and desegregation to have your black children next to our white children in school, you call us racists because our white kids do better.

If we dumb down the class curriculum so that your black children can finally keep up academically, you say we're racists because they still fail the SAT exams for college entrance.

If we dumb down the SAT so that you can score better, you say that we're racists because the colleges try to teach us about "dead white men".

If we dumb down the college experience so that you can feel more comfortable, you call us "racists" because there aren't as many scientists, doctors, and engineers who are black.

Whites aren't cowards because we don't seek you out on the weekends. We're simply exhausted with trying to keep up with your latest accusation.

Barry In Charge: Signing AARP Makes The Market Tumble 021709

This is the moment our nation, nay, the world, was told that "has to be acted on with great urgency", by Barry. After failing a few times in Congress, the bill was finally passed under great duress from Idiot Queen Pelosi last Friday [her plane was leaving to Europe at 6pm that night, and didn't want to be late].

But...it wasn't signed until Tuesday! What reason could prevent the Great Hope from delaying our recovery (sic) for that many days after he had implored Congress to hurry, hurry, hurry?

According to reports, Barry was chillin' and taking a vacation with his woman. Even though nothing forbids a sitting president from signing a bill wherever he or she may be at that given time, Barry didn't feel like working on this third week in office.

This is what it looked like when he passed the Trojan Horse known as AARP in Denver yesterday:

The Obama Constituent: Please Grant My Wish King Obama

We had Henrietta The Homeless here in Ft Myers just recently try to cry in front of him and ask for "her own kitchen" [even though she'd owned three properties in the past 5 years, and sold them all in order to get disability]; the woman on camera last year who went on and on about how Obama would make it to where she didn't have to make a mortgage payment, or pay for gas anymore; yet they keep coming:



This is the result of cultivating a victimhood mentality for these people, and there is only one party responsible for it. These people can't move forward on their own and overcome their obstacles without crying to the government because the Democrats, from the birth of the black person here in America, has been telling them: You can't do it on your own. You need the Democrat party to get back at The Man.

These women sound like either shameless hucksters trying to get over on the system or a child trying to get the desert without eating the carrots first like they were told.

Rahm Emanuel: Tax Cheating Millionaire

From The Weekly Standard:

Big Democrats just can't seem to get right with Big Government, lately.

Tim Geithner "mistakenly" avoided more than $40,000 in taxes. Nancy Killefer withdrew her nomination over word that she failed to pay employment taxes for household help. Tom Daschle "honestly" overlooked more than $100,000 for a car service donated to him by a lobbying company. Hilda Solis, Obama's Labor Secretary nominee, faces questions over her husband's failure to pay thousands in tax bills, some of them 16 years old.

Now, it turns out, skull-cracker Rahm Emanuel himself has been crashing in a colleague's basement for five years for free and, you guessed it, not paying taxes on the abode.

Gawker first reported that Emanuel rents a basement apartment last week, mostly to make fun of the chief of staff for sleeping on a futon under a blacklight poster of Bob Marley. Which is an important part of the story, but it turns out the residence in question isn't zoned for rentals.

That sent Emanuel's colleague and alleged landlord out to deny the charges. Rep. Rose DeLauro (D-Conn.) told her hometown paper, "Hey, it's cool. He doesn't rent from me. He lives there for free!"

"I wanted to make clear: we have no separate apartment in our DC house, no rental apartment; all our bedrooms and living areas are part of the house and accessible. They are often used by close family and friends. In mid-November, I
got a call from the DC zoning office indicating that somebody had lodged a complaint and asked to inspect the property, which we welcomed. My husband was there for the inspection, which was uneventful and we did not hear again from the zoning office."

Wow, so one of the most powerful men in Washington is either the 7th-year undergrad rocking out to Dave Matthews in his efficiency pad in between shifts at the Gyro Wrap or the masterful mooch who passed out on your couch after a tailgate freshman year and never, ever left. One wonders if he even pays his part of utilities. That hot shower water is not free, Rahmbo.

Hospitality between colleagues is not prohibited by House ethics rules, but a gift of this size would have required a written waiver from the Standards Committee, which neither party has yet produced.

But, let's not stop there with the questionable ethics. DeLauro is married to one Stan Greenberg, a Democratic pollster who has made quite a pile of money off work supplied to him by none other than his semi-permanent house guest. Living for free in the home of a Democratic pollster whom you employed as both a Congressman and as chair of the DCCC might run up against the ethics rules of the "most open and transparent" administration in history. That revolving door Obama keeps talking about is actually the private entrance to Emanuel's digs.

Let's say the Obama administration overlooks the ethics lapses— after all, they've set the bar so high, that each failure to reach it is simply a reminder of their superiority, according to spokesman Robert Gibbs. What of the pesky tax issue?

To most people, this is “imputed income” — non-financial gifts or compensation that should be reported to the IRS. Emanuel and DeLauro defend their conduct by saying that House ethics rules permit “hospitality between colleagues.”

It would likely fall in the same category as Daschle's car service in the IRS' eyes. And, that would put Rahm Emanuel in the same category as Geithner, Killefer, and Daschle. Clearly, the Cult of Competence does not allow decent accountants. (source)

Useful Idiots: College Students At SFSU

Barry In Charge: America's Epitaph: "We Won't Weaponize Space"

Today North Korea announced that "it is preparing a rocket launch, claiming the country has the right to "space development"—a term Pyongyang has used in the past to disguise a long-range missile test as a satellite launch. " (source)

There is a belief amongst some that America is a bully. They have been saying this ever since we won WW II. The communists who infiltrated our universities, the State Department, and the Executive branch, have worked for three generations to conjur up this notion that if only America would lay down its arms, that the world would be a safer place.

"But we don't use our military to conquer", you may say in protest. And you would be right. But that doesn't matter to the useful idiots like Jimmy Carter, Madeline Albright, Bill Clinton, and Barry Obama.

It may take a mushroom cloud over one of our nation's cities to finally make Barry realize that there's nothing laudable about pacifism. He is a pure coward, and it is hard to teach an old dog like him new tricks. The chance to teach him a lesson was lost when he was attending a $20,000/yr prep school in Hawaii in his youth.

Barry was too cool to consider saving a mostly white nation called America. When many of us were raised with ideals of patriotism, my country right or wrong, and other quiant notions, Barry was being taught that white America is to blame for the world's problems. Our greed, strong military, and capitalist economy needed to be brought down a peg or two.

After all of that indoctrination, Barry only felt a need to help and protect southside Chicago residents who look like him and Michelle.

Apparently, he thinks the rest of us in America need to be taught a lesson about how much we're hated around the world:



Barry was raised in the lap of luxury by doting grandparents who sacraficed their own financial savings to provide him with his world-class education and soft upbringing.

And that's the problem with Barry. He never saw anything worth fighting for, and he realized that he wouldn't have to fight if he just played the role of poor, put-upon black man here in America. We would trip all over ourselves to give him everything he ever wanted, and we would feel ashamed of ourselves if he ever claimed that something was wrong here in America.

Hell, we'd even elect him into office if it meant that we wouldn't be thought of as "racist" anymore.

In the wake of today's announcement by North Korea, are you beginning to see why it is important to educate yourself, to prevent being hoodwinked by con men?

Obama Coin Scam: A Metaphor For Our Time

Now check out a hit piece from ABC affiliate KATU on this scam:

Isn't it poetic? The coin scam is the Obama scam.

Not only does the metaphor apply to Obama and the coin (all flash but no substance), but to the Obamaniacs and coin purchasers, as well.

Cloward-Piven Strategy: Ramming The Stimulus Package Through Congress And Hiding The Details In A PDF

CLOWARD-PIVEN

Nancy Pelosi is due to embark on an 8-day tour of Europe tonight, and the word on the Hill is that the passage of this Euthenasia Act Of 2009 must pass tonight so that she can fly away without any legislative chores left undone.

Our nation is about to commit hari-kari, and the Idiot Queen of the Left is only worried about making her flight. Nero fiddles while Rome burns.

I found an article this morning from Human Events that explains even further how nightmarish this con-job is turning out to be: The Dems didn't even make the Stimulus Bill public until last night on the internet, but before they did they spent hours converting the 1,100-page bill to pdf files!

PDF files are nothing more than a jpg! The search engines can't scan for keywords when they're looking through mere images. The bill is released last night, and the Dems are actually telling the Republican congressmen that 6 hours or more is all they get in order to know what they are voting on.

Could you effectively read 1,100 pages in a day? Even with a staff of 20 people reading a section apiece, the congressman isn't given enough time to process all of this information.

When we look back at how our nation started to fall, this will be the tracks that lead to the water's edge, where our lifeless body floats undisturbed.

From Human Events today:

Democratic staffers released the final version of the stimulus bill at about 11 p.m. last night after delaying the release for hours to put it into a format which people cannot “search” on their home computers.

Instead of publishing the bill as a regular internet document -- which people can search by “key words” and otherwise, the Dems took hours to convert the final bill from the regular searchable format into “pdf” files, which can be read but not searched.

Three of the four .pdf files had no text embedded, just images of the text, which did not permit text searches of the bill. That move to conceal the bill’s provisions had not been remedied this morning at the time of publication of this article. (You can find the entire bill on the House Appropriations [http://appropriations.house.gov/] website.)

So, what are they hiding?

A lot. We searched the bill randomly -- the only way possible -- to see what’s being hidden from the public and the members of Congress who will be voting on the bill today. We found one provision that may be a good example of why the Democrats are desperate to stop any exposure of what is in this bill. Like this gem:SEC. 1607.

(a) CERTIFICATION BY GOVERNOR -- Not later than 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act, for funds provided to any State or agency thereof, the Governor of the State shall certify that: 1) the State request and use funds provided by this Act , and; 2) funds be used to create jobs and promote economic growth.

(b) ACCEPTANCE BY STATE LEGISLATURE -- If funds provided to any State in any division of this Act are not accepted for use by the Governor, then acceptance by the State legislature, by means of the adoption of a concurrent resolution, shall be sufficient to provide funding to such State.

This provision --– apparently aimed at conservative governors such as South Carolina’s Mark Sanford who does not want the federal money -- would overturn state laws and constitutions, intervening directly in the state’s government to give the legislature the power to overturn a government’s decision.This provision probably violates the US Constitution, a matter which will be of no concern to Congressional Democrats.

This act -- to strong-arm state governments and a governor’s ability to control the state budget -- is Chicago-style bipartisanship.This bill is so bad that even the Associated Press analyst report today concludes that the bill will not jump-start the economy.

Scramble in the SenateRoll Call is reporting that Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) will likely not be able to travel to Washington for the vote. This causes a conundrum for Reid, as it would bring the vote total down to 60 -- the number needed -- but no Republican wants to go on record as the 60th vote. Reid may try to get around Senate rules to enable Specter, Snowe and Collins to avoid being Vote #60 for the stimulus bill. (source)

ISLAMOFILE 021209: Dutch Politician Arrested In UK After Being Invited To Show His Movie Fitna By The House of Lords

Our brothers in the UK insist on doing themselves in, it seems. The political correctness that is trying to commit cultural homicide in our country has already gained great power in England. They are suffering from a social system of chronic infusion of a certain people who insist on replacing English Law with Sharia Law.

There is a Dutch politician, Geert Wilders, who has produced a simple video, factual and researched, that shows the connection between the actions of Islamic fundamentalists and the Quran.

"Well, duh!" you may say, and I agree with that sentiment. But for the multi-culturalists, their lips tighten and they clench at their purses when you start talking about a certain race of people. To them, we are all the same, merely products of our societies.

So when this Dutch MP arrives to the UK after being invited to display his new film, he is snatched away at Heathrow airport, then quickly deported.

"Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary refused Mr Wilders entry because his opinions "would threaten community security and therefore public security" in the UK." (source)

This is his film:

FAIRNESS DOCTRINE REDUX: The Clinton Appeal

This is no surprise, of course.

Only a year into his presidency, Bill Clinton was trying to silence dissent, as any good Communist does, by declaring that America's airwaves were full of "hate and intolerance". Now, if you can recall, the only nationally-syndicated conservative voice was Rush, Barry Farber, and maybe a couple of regional hosts, but there was mainly one: Rush Limbaugh. Isn't it amazing to see the reactionary Left practically hyperventilate over an AM radio talk show? Here's Clinton's response in part about "the media" from a 1994 interview with two hosts on KMOX in St Louis:

I think there's too much cynicism and too much intolerance. But if you look at the information they get, if you look at how much more negative the news reports are, how much more editorial they are, and how much less direct they are, if you look at how much of talk radio is just a constant unremitting drumbeat of negativism and cynicism, you can't—I don't think the American people are cynical, but you can't blame them for responding that way.

We, for example, we had a meeting the other day, and a group of people were told that under our budgets we were going to bring the deficit down 3 years in a row for the first time since Harry Truman was President. And some of them said, "Well, I just don't believe you. We never hear that on the news. I just don't believe you." It's a fact. I've worked hard to do it. And we're going to—we're bringing the deficit down. That's what bothers me. (source)

By 1995, Rush was still on the air, so, using the Oklahoma City bombing as an excuse to silence dissent, Bill clinton stoked the fire as he spoke in Mineapolis only days after the bombing:

In this country we cherish and guard the right of free speech. We know we love it when we put up with people saying things we absolutely deplore. And we must always be willing to defend their right to say things we deplore to the ultimate degree. But we hear so many loud and angry voices in America today whose sole goal seems to be to try to keep some people as paranoid as possible and the rest of us all torn up and upset with each other. They spread hate. They leave the impression that, by their very words, that violence is acceptable. You ought to see - I'm sure you are now seeing the reports of some things that are regularly said over the airwaves in America today.

Well, people like that who want to share our freedoms must know that their bitter words can have consequences and that freedom has endured in this country for more than two centuries because it was coupled with an enormous sense of responsibility on the part of the American people.

If we are to have freedom to speak, freedom to assemble, and, yes, the freedom to bear arms,we must have responsibility as well. And to those of us who do not agree with the purveyors of hatred and division, with the promoters of paranoia, I remind you that we have freedom of speech, too. And we have responsibilities, too. And some of us have not discharged our responsibilities. It is time we all stood up and spoke against that kind of reckless speech and behavior.

If they insist on being irresponsible with our common liberties, then we must be all the more responsible with our liberties. When they talk of hatred, we must stand
against them. When they talk of violence, we must stand against them. When they say things that are irresponsible, that may have egregious consequences, we must call them on it. The exercise of their freedom of speech makes our silence all the more unforgivable. So exercise yours, my fellow Americans. Our country, our future, our way of life is at stake. I never want to look into the faces of another set of family members like I saw yesterday, and you can help to stop it.

Our democracy has endured a lot over these last 200 years, and we are strong enough today to sort out and work through all these angry voices. But we owe it to our children to do our part. Billy Graham got a standing ovation yesterday when he said, "The spirit of our Nation will not be defeated." I can tell by your response that that is true. But you must begin today.

(source)

Barry has a lot of comrades in this effort.