Tuesday, February 11, 2025

Reality Check: DOGE Success Report_Over 1 Billion in budget cuts in just 3 weeks

 

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk gestures as he speaks during the inaugural parade inside Capital One Arena, in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 20, 2025. Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images

Amid Democrats’ pushback, lawsuits, and threats to DOGE employees, the cuts keep coming—including almost $1 billion announced on Feb. 10.

By Nathan Worcester
2/11/2025Updated:2/11/2025

After three weeks, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has made over $1 billion in cuts, according to to numbers from the White House.
Some of the biggest savings reckoned by the White House stem from the cancellation of more than 100 contracts relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Trump’s day-one executive orders included one seeking to end DEI in the federal government. The White House estimates those cancellations alone saved over $1 billion.

DOGE also ended a $748 million contract for a new embassy in South Sudan.

Smaller cuts hit subscriptions for the news outlet Politico from NASA—$500,000—and $26 million in contracts for “executive coaching” and “strategic communication.”

DOGE’s X account unveiled almost $1 billion in additional cuts on the evening of Feb. 10.
They encompass $101 million worth of DEI-related training grants from the Department of Education, a department that Trump has floated eliminating, along with $881 million in other contracts involving it.
DOGE also publicly announced the end of $9 million in contracts with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, including for a “Women in Forest Carbon Initiative Mentorship Program” and “Central American Gender Assessment Consultant Services.”

Rep. Blake Moore (R-Utah), co-chair of the bipartisan House DOGE Caucus, told The Epoch Times DOGE was “going through and creating some waves—and they’re definitely creating some airwaves.”

Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.) told The Epoch Times that DOGE was designed “to take from the poor to give to the rich.”
“I feel that a lot of it is illegal,” he added.
The DOGE FightDOGE is a time-limited organization repurposed from the United States Digital Services and situated in the Executive Office of the President. Before Election Day in 2024, Trump announced his intentions to create DOGE and place tech entrepreneur Musk, by that point a key campaign benefactor, at its helm.
Trump issued the executive order establishing DOGE on the first day of his new administration. The order mandates DOGE teams of at least four in every agency, placing them under a temporary organization “dedicated to advancing the President’s 18-month DOGE agenda.”

Its interactions with other executive-branch agencies, including the Department of Labor and the Treasury Department, have sparked protests attended by Democrats from the House and Senate, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and other Democrats protest outside the Department of Labor in Washington on Feb. 5, 2025. Labor groups and Democrats were opposing access to department data by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Elon Musk's time-limited commission. Nathan Worcester/The Epoch Times

DOGE and its advocates have toted up wins and losses in the courts, where litigation concerning the commission and its employees is proliferating.
On Feb. 7, a D.C. federal judge, John Bates, ruled against restricting DOGE’s access to Department of Labor data in response to a lawsuit from various unions.
The next day, in a ruling on a different DOGE-related lawsuit, federal Judge Paul Engelmayer of the Southern District of New York, issued a temporary restraining order preventing DOGE employees from obtaining Treasury payment system data and requiring that they destroy any materials they may have obtained.

A hearing in the case is scheduled for Feb. 14.
Musk took to his social media platform, X, to call for the judge’s impeachment, describing him as “a corrupt judge protecting corruption.”
The Department of Justice sought to lift the restraining order in a Feb. 9 filing, arguing that it could be construed to prevent Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent from accessing Treasury payment system data.

The cuts and legal maneuvers are playing out as Musk and DOGE’s engineers face threats, including on social media.

A review of material on the social media platform Bluesky by The Epoch Times found numerous posts naming and, in multiple cases, threatening Musk and DOGE staff. One anonymous user named various DOGE engineers, referring to them as “Nazi scum” before adding, “The only good nazi is a dead nazi.”
The U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Ed Martin, has vowed to pursue those who break the law in threatening or harming DOGE employees “to the end of the Earth to hold them accountable.”

As Musk and his engineers surf a wave of reaction, economists concerned about the debt and deficit have responded to DOGE’s cuts with both enthusiasm and skepticism.

Ryan Bourne, who co-authored a report on DOGE for the libertarian Cato Institute, told The Epoch Times in an email that DOGE “could have a big qualitative impact, both on permanently changing the character of the civil service and undermining public trust in certain programs through a drumbeat of stories about wasteful spending.”
But Jessica Riedl of the Manhattan Institute wrote on X that DOGE’s declamations ring hollow given the scope of spending during Trump’s first administration and his unwillingness to make serious cuts to social spending and at the Pentagon—both significant contributors to persistent deficits.

“You have to stop cutting taxes and then address Social Security, Medicare, defense, and a lot of other popular programs. Wake me when the GOP goes there,” Riedl wrote, adding, “Don’t brag about your coupon-clipping frugality at the same time you are buying a $250,000 Ferrari.”
DOGE’s newest targets include the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as well as the Pentagon. In a Feb. 9 Fox News interview, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he was looking forward to partnering with DOGE.

Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wisc.), a retired Navy Seal, is handling the Veterans Affairs and Pentagon portfolios for the House DOGE Caucus.

“I could very, very reasonably cut tens of billions of dollars and improve veterans’ experiences, health care outcomes, education benefits. And we can do the same thing with the Department of Defense—get rid of these legacy programs that aren’t working, and then we’ll increase lethality and readiness,” he told The Epoch Times.

He would not comment on whether the outcome would be a lower overall Defense Department budget—a sticking point for many congressional Republicans seeking more money for the Pentagon.

Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), another pro-DOGER, said DOGE’s concern with Medicare or Social Security is confined to spotting “improper payments.” Medicaid, he told The Epoch Times, presents more opportunities for immediate reform.

“I think there are ways we can make these systems work and save quite a bit,” he said of the federal government’s large social programs.

“If we get to that point after we address the low-hanging fruit and we still have a problem, then at that point, we can address that,” Burlison added.
John Cochrane, a Hoover Institution economist, wrote in an analysis of Trump’s tax policy that the spending pinpointed by DOGE “is the means, not the end.”

“The US does need that great reform. But this isn’t the time. Get through the first year, maybe build a record of success,” Cochrane wrote on his blog, The Grumpy Economist.

Bourne, of the Cato Institute, also sees DOGE as a potential on-ramp for larger changes.

“Some might argue that the only way to get buy-in for entitlement reform in the future is to show the public you’ve made every effort to root out waste, mismanagement, and non-priority spending areas from the budget already,” he told The Epoch Times.

He said he suspects federal lawmakers must act to shore up DOGE’s moves—a goal that could face resistance in a narrowly divided Congress caught in perpetual battles over funding.
Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) has signaled that Democrats could use the government shutdown deadline, now little more than a month away, as leverage against DOGE.
Schumer has announced a four-pronged plan to fight the Trump administration that includes a panel for government employee whistleblowers—and he and his counterpart in the House, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), have introduced legislation to curb DOGE’s Treasury data access.

On the other side of the aisle, Sens. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) and James Lankford (R-Okla.) have introduced packages of DOGE-related bills. Ernst created the Senate’s DOGE Caucus, of which Lankford is also a member.

Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) speaks during an interview with The Epoch Times at his office on Capitol Hill in Washington on Jan. 30, 2025. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times

Moore, the House DOGE Caucus co-chair, told The Epoch Times pro-DOGE lawmakers were engaged in “parallel work,” independent of Musk and DOGE, though with some communication between Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and DOGE.

Moore said he had not recently communicated with DOGE, though there was some communication when it began.

In time, the parallel work in the executive and legislative branches “will converge,” Moore added.[SOURCE]

Reality Check_Surfacing For Air After So Long: Schadenfreude for us for once

February 11, 2025
Confessions of Schadenfreude

It’s difficult to catalog the range of visceral emotions I feel as I watch President Trump, Elon Musk, and his team of whiz kids at DOGE dismantle the Deep State, piece by piece.  Anger.  Joy.  Disgust.  Grim satisfaction.  Schadenfreude.

We’ve known for years that our federal government has been robbing us blind.  We’ve felt it in our bones but been unable to prove it, while those who gorge themselves at the public trough — politicians, contractors, media figures, lobbyists, lawyers, NGO execs — become rich beyond most of our wildest dreams.  To see all that graft and corruption finally dragged into the light of day, with receipts, is almost more than I can process.

As I write, when I find it hard to express my thoughts, I often turn to narrative.  So let me start with a little story, a true story, one I’ve thought of many times in the past two weeks.

Last summer, my wife accompanied me to the Washington, D.C. area, where I was helping conduct a three-day workshop for a group of conservative college kids sponsored by The Leadership Institute.  She often comes with me on these trips, now that we’re empty-nesters, especially if I’m going someplace interesting or somewhere she’s never been.  Usually my expenses are paid, and all we have to do is buy an extra plane ticket.  And since D.C. has always been one of her favorite places to visit, as an ardent American history buff, she was happy to tag along and see some of the sights while I worked during the day and with me at night. 

One fine evening, after a rain shower had cooled things down, we decided to go for a walk in the obviously rather affluent neighborhood right behind our upscale hotel in Arlington.  Lining the quiet, tree-canopied streets were quite a few stately older homes, several smaller older homes, and whole slew of large, modern, brand-new homes, some still under construction.

Out of curiosity, my wife pulled up Zillow on her phone and began looking at home prices, using the function that allows you to see the estimated value of every house in the vicinity all at once.  I heard her exclaim, “Oh, my gosh” and looked over her shoulder at the app.  Even the oldest, most run down house on the block was valued at over $1.5 million.  The larger ones were in the $2–3 million range, with the new homes pushing $4 million.

“Where do all these people get that kind of money?” she asked.

“From us,” I replied.

I understand that’s a bit of a generalization.  Some of those homes have been owned by the same people for years and simply appreciated in value.  Then again, you can see on Zillow when a home has been sold, and most of the ones we were looking at had changed hands at least once within the last five years.

I also understand that not everyone in D.C. makes his money directly from the federal government.  Indeed, most federal employees can’t afford to live in a neighborhood like that, which is why they live far from downtown and commute an hour or more to work.  (Back when they used to commute, I mean, before they all started working from home — something else Trump is putting an end to.)

And yes, it’s true that other metro areas, like San Francisco and Chicago, are also very expensive, because they have lucrative industries that draw people to them.  In the Bay Area, for example, you have Big Tech, which seems to be creating new millionaires every day.  People who are interested in the technology field, and who want to make a lot of money, are drawn to the area.

That’s not to say everyone in the Bay Area works in the tech industry, or that everyone who lives there is rich.  It’s just that the tech sector is the main driver of the area’s economy and the main reason so many rich people live there.  If the tech companies all went away, the economy in the Bay Area would collapse overnight.  (That very thing may be starting to happen.)

So what about Washington, D.C., which is nearly as affluent and expensive as San Francisco, if not more so?  What is the main industry there?  What is the driver of its economy?

You know the answer.  It’s the federal government.  That’s what draws people to D.C.  Not the climate or the food or the history.  People looking to make lots of money are drawn there by Big Gov, with its virtually limitless funds.  And what is the source of those funds?  Why, we are.  We the people, the taxpayers of the United States of America.  Under our Constitution, the government is essentially us.

Here’s where the schadenfreude comes in.

My wife and I have worked hard all our lives to achieve some level of success.  We make a decent living.  We’ve lived frugally.  We sacrificed to put four kids through college.  We haven’t taken on a ton of consumer debt, and we pay our bills on time.  We’ve saved and invested.

Now I look at my portfolio and, factoring in the last four years of inflation, I calculate that I may need to work until I’m 72 or older just so we don’t run out of money in retirement.  On one level, this is fine.  I enjoy what I do, and I’m not actually looking to retire anytime soon.  Nor am I complaining about the hard work.  I was raised to expect life to be like that.  We brought up our children the same way.

But then I stroll through a neighborhood like that one, in (or very near) our nation’s capital, and I see all these people who are making their money — most of them, anyway, directly or indirectly — from the federal government, the government I pay taxes for, and they’re ten times richer than I’ll ever be.

That’s a bitter pill to swallow — that any amount of my hard earned money, however small, goes toward enabling someone else to buy a $4-million home, a home I could never afford if I work until I’m 102.

Then Elon and his wunderkinds come along and show us that we were right all along, that we are being robbed, that the treasury is being plundered, that money — our money — is being funneled to people and places we would never approve, into worthless projects that, besides flouting our values, are mostly just money-laundering schemes to help the rich men north of Richmond get even richer.  

And then Elon and company begin to turn off the spigot.  Suddenly, the trough is no longer filling up.  And the Deep State operators and all their cronies and minions panic.  They’re being starved.  What will they do?  What will happen to the value of all those multi-million-dollar homes they’ve purchased with our money?

Hey, maybe in a couple of years I will be able to afford one of those after all.

Image via Pixabay.

DSSO_Piercing The Veil_Rand says, “If there was ever any doubt as to who bears responsibility for the COVID pandemic, Biden’s pardon of Fauci forever seals the deal."


AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

Robert Spencer 
11:09 AM
February 10, 2025

In comparison to the massive waste and fraud that Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has already uncovered, this is just a drop in the bucket. It is not so much a matter of money saved, however, as it is of rolling back the left’s sinister and destructive practice of forcing the celebration of its key figures as heroes. Anthony Fauci is no hero, and he doesn’t deserve a museum exhibit. Axing this exhibit is a step toward reclaiming the culture from the sinister authoritarians who have dominated it for far too long.


It's everywhere. There is, for example, a Little Golden Book and several other children’s books lionizing Kamala Harris and introducing budding young leftists to her alleged “achievements.” There are no children’s books about J.D. Vance. Fauci is likewise the hero of a Little Golden Book, and the museum exhibit was certain to offer more of the same: here, kids, is a selfless public servant. There was no chance that the exhibit would have gone on to tell the truth, as in something like “If you grow up to be like him, you’ll be celebrated everywhere for imposing authoritarian restrictions upon Americans, including measures that you knew didn’t work, in order to meet the challenge of a wildly exaggerated crisis!”

Fox News reported Sunday that “the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) canceled more than $180 million in contracts over 48 hours, including a nearly $170,000 contract for an Anthony Fauci museum exhibit.” $170,000 isn’t very much money at all when the government is showering billions upon terrorists, but it’s actually $170,000 more than the government should be spending to hail Fauci.

DOGE announced Friday that “in the past 48 hours, HHS canceled 62 contract [sic] worth $182 million. These contracts were entirely for administrative expenses – none touched any healthcare programs.” Now there’s a significant little detail. DOGE added: “This included terminating a $168,000 contract for an Anthony Fauci exhibit at the NIH Museum." This comes after Trump also terminated Fauci’s security detail, as well as after Old Joe Biden issued Fauci a preemptive pardon, even though the alleged hero hasn’t been charged with any crime.


At the time that the pardon was issued, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) wrote: “If there was ever any doubt as to who bears responsibility for the COVID pandemic, Biden’s pardon of Fauci forever seals the deal. As Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, I will not rest until the entire truth of the coverup is exposed. Fauci’s pardon will only serve as an accelerant to pierce the veil of deception. Ignominious! Anthony Fauci will go down in history as the first government scientist to be preemptively pardoned for a crime.”

Related: Donald Trump is Striking at the Heart of the Left's Central Belief

Paul added on Feb. 2: “I think, Anthony Fauci accepting the pardon, he doesn't escape judgment. I think history is gonna judge him harshly. So in some ways, from that point of view, I think he made a huge mistake accepting the pardon. If he wanted people to think he was innocent, you can actually reject the pardon. There's also supreme court [sic] precedent for when you accept a pardon, accepting guilt. And so in many ways, he has accepted guilt. Now his pardon is unspecified. It's preemptive and nonspecific, but that also means that it's going to be the burden on him to try to prove that he was innocent after accepting a pardon." This is the kind of man who should be celebrated in a museum exhibit? The NIH at this point should be trying to give the impression that it has never heard Fauci’s name.

It started with pulling down the statues of Confederates and renaming military bases that, in an earlier attempt to bind up the nation’s wounds, were named for them. Then the leftist thugs targeted not only statues of Confederate generals and slave-owners but of General Ulysses S. Grant, who led the great war to free the slaves; President Theodore Roosevelt, a “progressive” environmentalist; George Washington; Thomas Jefferson, and even the abolitionist Abraham Lincoln. In their place, we got statues of George Floyd, and you can be sure that if the left had succeeded in solidifying its hegemony over American culture, we would have started seeing statues of Obama, Kamala Harris, and Fauci in due time. They may still be coming if Trump and Musk don’t succeed in defeating the corrupt authoritarians they have confronted. At least for now, however, Fauci will not get his museum exhibit. That’s one small step in the right direction.[SOURCE]

Sunday, February 9, 2025

DSSO_Now It Can Be Told: USAID Helped Dems Steal 2020 Election by Funding Wuhan Lab That Created COVID, the Ultimate Excuse for Illegal Election Tampering




by C. Douglas Golden
The Western Journal
Feb. 9, 2025
7:00 am



As the U.S. Agency for International Development comes under scrutiny for what it’s been spending your money on — something it hasn’t been very forthcoming about before President Donald Trump’s administration made it one of the first targets of its Department of Government Efficiency downsizing initiative — the agency has come under fire for a whole lot of largesse that supported progressive, Democrat causes.

From the small but inexplicable ($32,000 for a transgender comic book in Peru) to the larger and more problematic (funding a supposedly independent journalistic non-profit referenced by a CIA analyst whistleblower responsible for catalyzing the first Trump impeachment as a reason to suspect the president of wrongdoing), USAID has had its fingers in plenty of pies it shouldn’t have.

However, what if I told you that USAID played a part in the catastrophic pandemic that helped the Democrats dramatically (and illegally) overhaul election laws — and thus, it could be said, helped steal the 2020 election for Joe Biden?


I know, I know: I sound a bit like a slightly unbalanced Morpheus handing Neo the red pill. Breadcrumb it all back, however, and it begins to make a lot more sense than you’d think.

On Jan. 25, the Central Intelligence Agency announced that it believed the COVID-19 virus escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. While they asserted this with “low confidence,” according to The Wall Street Journal, it was a major shift for an agency that had long refused to take a position in the matter, particularly when most U.S. intelligence agencies favored a natural origin.

The CIA now believes, however, “that a research-related origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is more likely than a natural origin based on the available body of reporting.”

This comes as a surprise to virtually no one with a functioning brain. The virus most closely related to SARS-CoV-2 was not found naturally near Wuhan, nor was any original host animal found, nor were any bats — the source of that family of coronaviruses — ever found being sold at the wet market supposedly responsible for the outbreak.

There was, meanwhile, an institute of virology hundreds of meters from where the outbreak began. There were numerous safety issues documented there and public evidence of a mishap there in October of 2019, around the time when scientists believe the virus would have begun to spread.

While this can’t be said to be dispositive for a lab leak, the balance of the evidence is pretty clear — and despite their best efforts, even the Chinese Communist Party can’t come up with a plausible theory regarding animal-to-human transfer five years in.

To make matters worse, the research being done at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was — despite Anthony Fauci’s verbal prestidigitations in denying it — so-called “gain of function” research, which is to say it took viruses (in this case, bat coronaviruses), and looked at ways they could become more transmissible or deadly.

This was done at a research facility where, again, security concerns existed going as far back as 2009. (No, I’m not missing a one somewhere in that number.)

One of the most controversial aspects of the research going on at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was that some of it was done by EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S. non-governmental organization which received millions grants from the government for, among other things, a program known as “PREDICT.”

And here’s where that darned red pill begins to take hold.

From EcoHealth’s website: “In an effort to identify and respond to new zoonotic diseases before they spread to humans, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) established its Emerging Pandemic Threats (EPT) program. The EPT program consists of four projects: PREDICT, RESPOND, IDENTIFY, and PREVENT. The PREDICT project seeks to identify new emerging infectious diseases that could become a threat to human health. PREDICT partners locate their research in geographic ‘hotspots’ and focus on wildlife that are most likely to carry zoonotic diseases – animals such as bats, rodents, and nonhuman primates.” [Emphasis ours.]

Not only that, documents show that Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases knew about both the bat coronavirus gain of function research EcoHealth Alliance was doing and the safety risks at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

USAID and the U.S. government continued to fund their work. And while there’s no evidence that EcoHealth Alliance specifically worked on the virus that intelligence services now believe leaked from the lab. What is known is that USAID continued the spigot of funding and refused to raise alarms publicly about the WIV.

The rest, as they say, is history.

Before the coronavirus pandemic, President Donald Trump was riding a strong economy and, despite the aforementioned impeachment over Ukraine funding (which seems positively quaint now), seemed in good shape to win re-election.

All of a sudden, he was taking the blame for both not shutting the country down hard enough and for the economic effects of a country shut down pretty darn hard.

Any mention of the “China virus” — as to emphasize its origins and curious fact it had originated from the same city where it just so happened bat coronaviruses were studied at a major research facility — was deemed to be racist and downplaying the origins of the virus, which we were told ad nauseam were completely, totally, absolutely the result of natural spillover from bats. Shut your trap about that pesky WIV, or EcoHealth Alliance — you conspiracy theorist!

Election rules were changed en masse, often illegally. Mail-in voting became the norm. Soon, low-information voters were being served ballots on a platter at the same time they were being told their president was a quack who believed injecting bleach into your veins would kill the virus. (As opposed to the very scientific prophylactic of wearing flimsy disposable masks, which would absolutely stop things if you just wore like six of them, and put on a face-shield, too.)

And, who would have thought: Joe Biden won! Fair and square, too — no thumbs on the scale, nosiree. The Freest and Fairest Election Ever™.

Mind you, Biden was clearly unable to do the job mentally when he was elected, just as much as he was when he was kicked to the curb for Kamala Harris last summer. The media certainly helped him over the finish line with that. He did no better on containing COVID — and arguably did far worse — than Donald Trump did. The national press covered for that, too.

That doesn’t erase the fact that a very predictable lab leak from an institution which received USAID funding through EcoHealth Alliance upended the 2020 election and allowed all of this to happen. Trump took all the blame, including for not discounting the lab-leak theory.

Meanwhile, a phalanx of U.S. government organizations — USAID among them — washed their hands of the responsibility of not just facilitating gain of function research, but doing it at an institution they should have blown the whistle on a decade prior. They shut up and pointed their fingers at the president, then propped up a senescent puppet.

No, that’s not stuffing the ballot boxes or hacking voting machines or any crazy notion like that. It’s stealing an election the good ol’ fashioned way: by massive deceit. And it was all subsidized by your tax dollars.

We’re now being told to swallow the blue pill: USAID, the Democrats tell us, is nothing more than an aid organization helping the poorest of the poor lift themselves out of destitution. EcoHealth Alliance? Wuhan Institute of Virology? What are those? Crazy talk.

Or, swallow that red pill and realize that, far from its original mission, USAID has become a taxpayer-to-NGO money transfer service that played a role — and however small or large you want to believe that role is, it’s still a role — in creating the conditions for upending the 2020 election, among other outrages.

Your dollars, your choice, America. I’d like to think you deserve the truth.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.[SOURCE]

Wednesday, January 1, 2025

2nd Attack As US Celebrates New Year's Day 2025_Trump Hotel in Las Vegas gets firebombed by agitator who set afire their rented Tesla Cybertuck and died in the process, injuring 7 more

By Alexandra E. PetriEmmett Lindner and Pashtana Usufzy
Jan. 1, 2025Updated 7:52 p.m. ET


One person was killed and at least seven people were injured after a Tesla Cybertruck exploded outside of the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas on Wednesday morning, the authorities said, on the same day that a man drove a truck through a crowd in New Orleans, killing at least 15 people.




Sheriff Kevin McMahill of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department said during a news conference that the authorities “believe this to be an isolated incident” but have not yet ruled out a connection to the Wednesday morning attack in New Orleans.




“There is no further threat to the community,” Sheriff McMahill said. Sheriff McMahill. As of Wednesday afternoon, there was no indication the explosion was connected to ISIS, which President Biden said inspired the New Orleans attack, but the investigation remains ongoing, he said.




At a news conference on Wednesday, Jeremy Schwartz, the acting F.B.I. special agent in charge in Las Vegas, said the agency is investigating whether the explosion “was an act of terrorism or not.”




“I know everybody’s interested in that word and trying to see if we can say, ‘Hey this is a terrorist attack,” Mr. Schwartz said. “That is our goal, and that’s what we’re trying to do”




The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department received a report of an explosion at about 8:40 a.m. local time at the Trump Hotel.




Elon Musk, Tesla’s chief executive, said in a statement on X that “the explosion was caused by very large fireworks and/or a bomb carried in the bed of the rented Cybertruck” and said the vehicle was functioning properly.




Police were told that a 2024 Cybertruck “pulled up to the last entrance doors of the hotel,” Sheriff McMahill said earlier at a news conference.




The driver was the only person in the truck, Mr. McMahill said, and was killed inside the vehicle. At least seven others were reported to have sustained minor injuries.




Sheriff McMahill said the authorities found gas canisters, camp fuel canisters and large firework mortars in the back of the truck. It was unclear how they were ignited, Sheriff McMahill said.




The authorities said that the truck was rented in Colorado using Turo, the same car rental app used in the New Orleans attack. The authorities were able to trace the car back to Colorado using video footage captured at charging stations, Sheriff McMahill said.




The truck arrived in Las Vegas at around 7:30 a.m. local time, Sheriff McMahill said, and went up and down Las Vegas Boulevard before immediately pulling into the Trump Towers.




Videos posted to social media showed what appeared to be a Tesla Cybertruck engulfed in flames just outside a hotel’s lobby entrance doors. Other social media posts showed what appeared to be a line of people being led out of the building.




“Earlier today, a reported electric vehicle fire occurred in the porte cochère of Trump Las Vegas,” Eric Trump, Donald J. Trump’s son and a leader of the Trump Organization, said in a statement on X. “The safety and well-being of our guests and staff remain our top priority.”




The same message was posted by the Trump Las Vegas’s social media account. People who were staying at the hotel said they were evacuated because of the fire.




Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.




Oscar Terol, who was visiting the United States from Barcelona, said that he was walking toward the hotel entrance with his wife when he stopped at a food cart right before the explosion occurred. “Those 10 seconds were the difference,” he said.




He and his wife stumbled backward and Mr. Terol saw a vehicle with flames and an array of colors shooting out of it that he assumed were fireworks.




Todd Hansen was on the 27th floor of the hotel when he said he heard a series of loud popping sounds. He took the elevator down to a waiting area, where he saw smoke and sprinklers on in the driveway outside of the hotel entrance.




“The elevator area was full of people,” Mr. Hansen said. “They would not let you out of the elevator area and into the lobby.” He went back to his room to alert his wife and they were both evacuated when they returned downstairs, he added.




Shir Poli, of San Antonio, said that he had noticed a gas-like smell on the floor and elevator. He managed to take his luggage with him as evacuations were underway.




Kerri Ford, of Wisconsin, said she had left her room for a cup of coffee when she was told to leave the building. She was set to be married on Wednesday afternoon, and her wedding dress and marriage license were left in the room.




“We didn’t know there was anything going on,” Ms. Ford said. “We just happened to come down for coffee and they’re like, ‘You have to evacuate.’”




The incident comes as Mr. Musk has cultivated a close and highly public relationship with President-elect Donald J. Trump. Mr. Musk has been using a cottage at Mar-a-Lago that Mr. Trump converted into a members-only club, providing easy access. In November, Mr. Trump tapped the tech billionaire to help lead a new Department of Government Efficiency.




And federal filings revealed in December showed that Mr. Musk had spent more than $250 million in the final months of the presidential campaign to help Mr. Trump win the White House.




The Trump Hotel in Las Vegas, on Fashion Show Drive, has nearly 1,300 suites and is 64 stories, according to the Trump Hotels website.




Pashtana Usufzy reported from Las Vegas and Emmett Lindner reported from New York. [SOURCE]

Reality Check: The Emperor Wears No Clothes_When the amateur FBI spokeswoman convinces no one that the New Orleans massacre was NOT an act of terrorism