Friday, September 20, 2024

What Evil Looks Like: "Blessed are those who end pregnancies, for they will be known for their loving kindness", says Christian pastor

Wednesday, September 18, 2024

DSSO_A People Get The Government They Deserve: Kamala boasts that simple compliance with all gun laws won't prevent her stormtroopers from entering your home to check for storage violations in order to confiscate them

DSSO:God Bless Robert F Kennedy, JR_Listen to an expert

DSSO: Saying The Quiet Part Out Loud: After an unsuccessful attempt at the Russian Collusion Hoax for years, Hillary turns her anger onto those who vote for Trump with threat of prosecution for openly supporting him

DSSO_It Is Here: The End Of Free Speech

Tuesday, September 17, 2024

DSSO_The PsyOps Continues Within a Day Of Trump's Second Assassination Attempt: Sky News gets it


2024 Presidential Election_Saying What We All Suspected: The bombshell claims of 'ABC whistleblower' who says Harris got help in debate

By Alex Hammer For Dailymail.Com

Several bombshell claims were made last week in an unverified document circulating online purporting to prove close collaboration between ABC News and Kamala Harris's team before her debate with former president Donald Trump.

The document is claimed to be a sworn statement penned by a staffer at ABC News. It was first published Sunday by an X account with the name 'Black Insurrectionist.' 

The document, said to be a sworn affidavit signed by a notary public the day before the debate, says the network gave Harris questions ahead of time while agreeing to a series of other preconditions to give the vice president an advantage over Trump.

Also prohibited at the debate were inquiries about Harris' stint as California Attorney General, as well as those involving her brother-in-law, Tony West, the document shows. It includes several other stipulations, as well as redactions obscuring the supposed staffer's identity.

A statement from ABC did not address the specific claims, instead saying: 'ABC News followed the debate rules that both campaigns agreed on... No topics or questions will be shared in advance with campaigns or candidates.'


A statement from ABC did not address the specific claims, instead saying: 'ABC News followed the debate rules that both campaigns agreed on... No topics or questions will be shared in advance with campaigns or candidates' 

The document, which describes containing a seal from the notary public that is not actually visible, says it was written by a New York resident. 

'I have worked for ABC news for over 10 years in various technical and administrative positions,' it reads, before stating that the staffer 'observed significant transformations in the nature of news reporting at the organization' within that span, as well as a 'shift from unbiased reporting to a model influenced by external factors.'

The purported staffer, who says they are not a supporter of Donald Trump, states that the intent of the affidavit is solely to 'address concerns regarding perceived biases within news reporting within my employer's debate.'

It was purportedly penned by a staffer who has worked at the station for some ten years, during which time they said ABC's style of reporting has become increasingly troublesome

The document goes on to cite 'promises made [that] the candidates would be held to firm discussions regarding their proposed policy stances and that the debate would not deteriorate into an ad campaign,' where 'candidates would simply make blanket statements without specific policy or explanation as to...'

The end of that sentence is redacted, along with several others.

The next section offers some purported insight into the political landscape of the ABC office, where the writer claimed employees were 'looking for a fair and honest debate' while questioning 'the clear biased [sic] that is well known throughout the company.'

It specifically mentions ABC News moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis, as well as C-suite staffers at the station and its connected companies.

'It is common knowledge that Debate Moderators as well as Chief Executive Officers of my employer are well known not to support Donald Trump,' the section reads.

'This led to several employees speaking up in regards to how fair the debate was going to be.'


Pictured are some of the purported agreements reached by the two parties

That same section includes 'specific instances related to the debate' that 'raise concerns about procedural fairness.'

The first was that the Harris campaign supposedly 'received particular accommodations, including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump, and assurances regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact [Harris's] appearance.'

The next stipulation was that Trump 'would be subjected to fact-checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny.'

It adds how Harris' team supposedly 'required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact checked,' allegedly 'via multiple communications with the Harris campaign. 

'The Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations,' it goes on to state.

It then claims that 'the Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.'

The document then gets into 'Harris campaign-imposed restrictions on the scope of questioning,' including: 'No questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden', 'No inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco,' and lastly, 'No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West.'

West, a prominent attorney who once worked as the general counsel for Uber, 'faces allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds,' according to alleged affidavit.

One post on X featuring the document has been viewed nearly 8million times in a little over 24 hours

Those claims are also unproven and have never been reported.

The document claims that West, who is married to Harris's sister, Maya, 'may be involved in [her] administration if she's elected.'

The New York Times recently reported that West is 'a major force behind Ms. Harris's campaign and its record-setting fund-raising,' and serves as a 'critical point of contact for business leaders and major donors.' 

The document then claims ABC 'employees expressing favorable views toward [Trump] experience significant concerns about potential retribution.'

The assertion is made before several lines of redacted text.

The purported staffer further claimed to have sent the document to House Speaker Mike Johnson

'I have also dispatched a Federal Express package containing this affidavit, sent on September 9th, 2024, and delivered to my residence on September 10th, 2024, which will remain unopened for potential investigative purposes,' the document states.

The document alleges that ABC News gave Harris questions ahead of the debate, along with agreeing to preconditions to give her a leg up on former President Donald Trump

The staffer then claims to have 'secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that the Harris Campaign insisted upon not only the Fact Checking of Donald Trump, but also insisted on what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances.'

'I make these statement under the penalty of perjury and without coercion of any kind,' it concludes.

Despite being unproven, the document has picked up steam on social media, being shared by several high-profile figures.

They include Senator Ted Cruz, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, billionaire hedge-funder Bill Ackman, and Elon Musk, with the latter reposting statements expressing belief in the claims made by Ackman.

Days earlier, before the documents were shared, Trump himself reposted an account claiming an 'ABC whistleblower allegedly will release an affidavit' showing that 'the Harris campaign was given sample questions.'

Such claims first surfaced on the account of right-wing influencer and January 6 participant Philip Anderson last week, two days after the debate.  

 
 




 
 

Despite being unproven, the document has picked up steam on social media, being shared by several high-profile figures. They include Senator Ted Cruz, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, billionaire hedge-funder Bill Ackman, and Elon Musk, with the latter reposting statements expressing belief in the claims made by Ackman, and Greene sharing an erroneous report about the person who penned the article dying in a car crash - before walking it back

That same day, a verified account with the name 'Black Insurrectionist' claimed it would release 'an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower' by the end of the weekend. On Sunday, the account posted the document.

A review by the left-wing Media Matters of recent activity on the account mentioned a post last month calling Harris and Tim Walz as 'disgusting creatures' and their supporters 'the delightful cesspool of humanity we are fighting here today.'

The account - which joined X in November 2023 - adds that the pair may be 'just plain flat out disgusting pedophiles.'

Another post called for '70 million people to do mass civil disobedience that will halt this country' to avoid a Harris win.

'The government just does what we want,' it added. The poster did not reveal how they came in contact with the supposed writer of the document.

ABC News has denied all of the allegations aired in it. [SOURCE]



DSSO_When The Evidence Of Conspiracy Is Overwhelming: How did Ryan Routh know where Trump would be? The six unanswered questions about assassination attempt

 

Members of FBI are seen at the crime scene outside the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida - AFP/Chandan Khanna

Story by Benedict Smith
Sept 16, 2024

As the investigation into the attempted assassination of Donald Trump enters its second day, a number of questions remain unanswered. 

Chiefly, how could suspect Ryan Wesley Routh have known where the Republican candidate would be? And why would he have decided on such a drastic course of action?

Here The Telegraph rounds up the key questions that remain for law enforcement.


Trump on course last year

Trump did not have any events listed on his public schedule, while his most recent campaign stops had taken place in Nevada.

How the Republican candidate’s would-be assassin worked out where he would be is the “million-dollar question”, according to Will Snyder, the Florida sheriff whose officers arrested Routh on Sunday.

“It’s hard for me to imagine how he got within rifle range of president Trump,” he told Fox News.

At a press conference on Monday afternoon, the Interim Director of the Secret Service said they were examining whether the suspect knew Trump would be on the course.

What was the gunman’s motivation?

Routh had voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election, yet eight years later he is suspected of making an attempt on the former president’s life.

He became disillusioned with the Republican, referring to him in a 2023 self-published book as  “buffoon”, a “fool” and “brainless”. But it is unclear why he would apparently turn on him so violently, or what he believed he might accomplish by shooting him.

While Right-wing commentators have claimed Routh is a “radical leftist”, his politics appear to be mudded.

           A suited Ryan Routh in front of the Capitol building in Washington (left) and in Kyiv (right)

After voting for Trump in 2016, he donated to Democratic candidates in 2020, and backed Nikki Haley’s challenge to Trump in the 2024 Republican primary. A vehicle outside his home in Hawaii displays an old “Biden-Harris” sticker.

Routh’s politics seems confused and his motivations unknown. Authorities say he is not speaking following his arrest on Sunday.

Why did the gunman have a Go-Pro?

A Go-Pro was discovered at the scene after the gunman fled, which authorities said showed they planned to record the assassination attempt.

However, it is not clear precisely what the compact camera – usually used for capturing adventure sports – would have been used for.

The Go-Pro camera, seen left, attached to the fence - Reuters

Would the gunman have kept it to watch the shooting back himself? Or was he planning to upload the footage to social media?

How long had the gunman been in the area?

Routh is registered as living at an address in Hawaii.

By contrast, Thomas Matthew Crooks – who fired at Trump at the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania in July – lived a relatively short distance away. Routh’s movements remain a mystery, at least for the moment.

That means it is unclear how long the gunman had been in Florida before taking up position with an AK-47 at the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Secret Service and Homeland Security agents check a former home of suspect Ryan Routh - Jonathan Drake

The assault rifle was found along with ceramic body armour at the scene – something Andrew McCabe, a former senior FBI official, said indicated “a very high level of pre-planning”.

But whether Routh travelled to Florida with the intention of shooting Trump, or could have drawn up those plans later, is unclear.

The FBI said at at a press conference on Monday they were in the process of investigating how long he had been in the South Florida area.

Why wasn’t the gunman spotted by security?

Another unanswered question is why the gunman was not spotted by the Secret Service while he lay in wait at the golf course for almost twelve hours.

Officials claimed that Routh had taken up position at the course in the early hours of Sunday morning, citing data from the 58-year-old’s mobile phone that placed it at the treeline from 1:59am to 1:31pm.

Yet Trump’s security detail only noticed an AK-47 pointing out of the trees while the former president was playing golf just one hole away.

The Secret Service revealed on Monday that because Trump’s round of golf was not scheduled, agents did not sweep the perimeter. 

The suspect had been in the bushes for the 12 hours that corresponded with his phone data, the FBI confirmed on Monday.

The assault rifle has a maximum effective range of some 330 yards, while the former president is estimated to have been some 300 to 500 yards away. 

his was “not a long distance” for an AK-47 equipped with a scope, as Palm Beach county sheriff Ric Bradshaw noted.

Moreover, it comes after weeks of scrutiny and criticism of the Secret Service following the attempt on Trump’s life in July.

Law enforcement will likely be attempting to recreate the steps of the gunman on the day in question, but have so far not set out how the individual was able to get so close.

What was in the gunman’s car?

Routh was arrested on the I-95 highway, some 50 miles from Trump’s golf course, in a black Nissan.

The vehicle would have been searched by law enforcement after Routh’s apprehension.

Sources told CNN that the vehicle belonged to Routh’s daughter, which suggests that a background check has taken place. Court documents state that the number plates are registered to a different vehicle that was reported stolen.

 


The car in which Ryan Routh was arrested (circled)

The contents of that car, which have not been made public, could potentially shed light on the plans on the assassination attempt.

There is speculation that the car contains maps or other documents that could reveal what Routh knew of Trump’s movements and the planning that had gone into the alleged assassination attempt.

Warrants are out for the FBI to search a number of addresses linked to the suspect as well as vehicles, cameras and mobile phones. [SOURCE]

2024 Presidential Election_The Question About Eating Cats, Dogs, and Eagles in Springfield, OH: From the residents themselves

Saturday, September 14, 2024

2024 Presidential Election_Ready To Be Lectured Again? You don't want to upset John Legend, do you?

Tuesday, August 27, 2024

DSSO_Someone's Going To Run For Office: Zuckerberg cries Mea Culpa over election collusion with Feds, says that it was a mistake now that the damage is done

 

Mark Zuckerberg said he regrets suppressing certain Covid-19 stories on his platforms - Tom Williams/Getty Images

Mark Zuckerberg: Covid censorship was wrong and I wish I’d fought it

Mark Zuckerberg has said Facebook and Instagram were wrong to censor posts about Covid during the pandemic and that the company should have fought pressure from the Biden administration.

In a letter to a US committee investigating online content moderation, Mr Zuckerberg said senior White House officials “repeatedly pressured” the company after Joe Biden was inaugurated in 2021.

He said that Facebook “made some choices” that it would not have made today.

In a letter to Jim Jordan, the Trump-supporting head of the House of Representatives’ Judiciary Committee, Mr Zuckerberg wrote: “In 2021, senior officials from the Biden administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain Covid-19 content, including humour and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree.

“Ultimately, it was our decision whether or not to take content down, and we own our decisions, including Covid-19-related changes we made to our enforcement in the wake of this pressure.

“I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it. I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today.

“Like I said to our teams at the time, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any administration in either direction – and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again.”

During the pandemic, Facebook added misinformation alerts to users when they commented on or liked posts that were judged to contain false information about Covid.

It also deleted posts criticising the Covid vaccine, or suggesting that Covid was developed in a Chinese laboratory, a theory that has since become supported by some mainstream scientists and government agencies.

In the 2020 election campaign, Mr Biden had accused Facebook of “killing people” by not clamping down on Covid posts more enthusiastically. He later rowed back on the comments.

Mr Zuckerberg also said Facebook was wrong to suppress a New York Post story about Hunter Biden, Mr Biden’s son, which revealed that Hunter had offered business contacts access to his father when he was vice president.

Facebook demoted a New York Post story about Hunter Biden which claimed he had offered contacts access to his father when he was vice-president - Craig Hudson/Reuters

He said the FBI had warned the company about a “potential Russian disinformation operation” about the Biden family. Facebook had demoted the story while it was reviewed by fact checkers, which Mr Zuckerberg said was a mistake.

The Hunter Biden laptop story, which was blocked by Twitter after it was published, was potentially damaging to Mr Biden’s election campaign. Blocking it has been seen by Republicans as proof of Silicon Valley’s Left-wing influence.

Elon Musk released a series of internal emails about the decision to block the story after buying Twitter.

The Republican-controlled House Judiciary Committee called Mr Zuckerberg’s admissions a “big win for free speech”.

Meanwhile, the White House defended its actions.

It said: “When confronted with a deadly pandemic, this administration encouraged responsible actions to protect public health and safety.

“Our position has been clear and consistent: we believe tech companies and other private actors should take into account the effects their actions have on the American people, while making independent choices about the information they present.” [SOURCE]

 
 

DSSO_ Pulling Back The Curtain Of Oz: Congressional hearings about compromised agents within the Secret Service from a former SS agent, Dan Bongino

Monday, August 26, 2024

On the anniversary of the evacuation of Kabul

The anniversary of the botched evacuation of Kabul in 2021 brought back memories. My honored alma mater, the 82nd Airborne Division was called in at the last second to enforce the final stage of the pullout. Lack of leadership resulted in the loss of 13 heroes despite the best of efforts by the servicemen and women performing that evacuation, plus the disastrous rescue of thousands of US citizens and locals who helped us for the past 20 years.

I was attending the 75th annual convention of the 82nd Airborne Division Association in the days before this epic ending of our war in Afghanistan, in Houston where my brother from my time at Bragg in the mid-80's is currently the Chairman of the local Houston chapter that hosted the convention that year, and put together this little video about what it felt like when we heard the news break:

 

2024 Presidential Election: What Convention Bump?_First RFK, Now Tulsi: The Endorsements Keep Coming In

 


2024 Presidential Election: When Bedfellows Are Strange But Who Cares?: RFK Jr.’s Speech Wasn’t Republican Or Democrat But American

 

                                      Robert F. Kennedy / Twitter screenshot

The reasons Robert Kennedy Jr. gave for limiting his campaign and endorsing Donald Trump aren’t matters of partisanship or policy, but a matter of survival for our constitutional republic. 

By: Margot Cleveland
August 26, 2024 

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. excoriated the Democrat Party, U.S. government, and our supposedly free press during his Friday press conference. Kennedy’s announcement that he will remove his name as a candidate for president in swing states and endorses Donald Trump brought cheers from Trump supporters and derision from Democrat die-hards.

But what does the alliance between Trump and Kennedy mean to the future of the Republican platform? Properly understood, nothing.

Friday’s speech was not about the policies of the Grand Old Party any more than it was about whether Kennedy’s old-school Democrat belief system remained intact. As Kennedy acknowledged, he had been “a ferocious critic of many of the policies during [Trump’s] first administration,” and the two will “continue to have very serious differences” about “issues and approaches.”

Yet an alliance will allow him and Trump to “work[] together on the existential issues upon which we are in concordance,” Kennedy explained during his press conference last week. The key “existential issues” Kennedy identified, and the hopes he professed for our country, transcend partisan politics and harken to the days of our founding.

Kennedy identified institutional corruption of both the government and the press, manifesting itself in “government propaganda,” a “resort to censorship and media control, and the weaponization of the federal agencies” as foundational threats to the country. Lawfare at the voting booth, against both Trump and Kennedy, further built the former Democrat’s case for exiting the race.

These complaints are not Republican or Democrat: indeed, every American should be horrified by the weaponization of our government and the censorship-industrial complex that converted the press from a check on our government to a co-conspirator.

Whether peddling the Russia collusion hoax against Trump, censoring information about Covid-19 vaccines, or hiding Joe Biden’s mental incapacity from the public, the press’s complicity in interfering in both elections and governance leaves Americans with one choice: an electoral revolt against the party responsible for the government’s corruption. As Kennedy put it: “When a U.S. president colludes with or outright coerces media companies to censor political speech, it’s an attack on our most sacred right of free expression, and that’s the very right upon which all of our other constitutional rights rest.”

“Securing our border,” “protecting freedom of speech,” and “getting the U.S. intelligence agencies out of the business of propagandizing and censoring and surveilling Americans and interfering with our elections”—all pressing issues Kennedy identified as reasons for his decision to suspend his campaign and endorse Trump—aren’t matters of partisanship or policy, but a matter of survival for our constitutional republic.

What of Ukraine, ending the forever wars, and fighting “big pharma, big tech, big ag, and big money,” as well as ending the childhood disease epidemic? Kennedy also identified those as areas of agreement with Trump.

For some of these issues, such as ending the war in Ukraine, Trump has made his position clear, prevailing with his view in the Republican primary. Trump’s alliance with Kennedy, then, changes nothing about these. On other issues, Republicans will need to assess any forthcoming proposals—just as Kennedy and his supporters will. There well may be fierce disagreements.

Here, though, is the key to why the alliance matters: No one, Democrat, Republican, or Independent, can properly assess a proposed policy without transparency and honest reporting. Nor can a country founded on liberty survive if the government commandeers the press to brainwash its citizenry.

There will be plenty of time for Republicans to fight over policies. Now is the time to win on the fundamentals. Just as Kennedy’s decision to limit his campaign and support Trump does not represent an abandonment by the lifelong Democrat of his policy positions, Republicans welcoming Kennedy and his supporters to the revolution aren’t sacrificing their core conservative convictions either. [SOURCE]


 

Saturday, August 17, 2024

2024 Presidential Election_JD Vance Video From His HS Days: Where he comes from

THE ENEMY WITHIN_ When They Say The Quiet Part Out Loud: The case when Kamala Harris actually bragged of her intent and adoration of using Stasi-like tactics to wield totalitarian control

Wednesday, August 14, 2024

WORLD TODAY: What Depths They Stoop To: Wikipedia SCRUBS JD Vance's medals from his prior service with the Marine Corps

2024 Presidential Election: The Enemy Within: Harris Campaign Caught Pushing Literal Fake News Headlines In Americans’ Google Searches

 

                                    (Photo by RONDA CHURCHILL/AFP via Getty Images)

 

Reagan Reese White House Correspondent

Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign has been caught editing various outlets’ headlines to appear in Americans’ Google searches as sponsored ads, according to an Axios report.

Over the last ten days, the Harris campaign has edited the headlines and descriptions of almost a dozen outlets’ articles found through Google search advertisements to appear as search ads from the Harris campaign, according to Axios. Several of those outlets, including CNN, USA Today and NPR, told the outlet they were not aware that their articles were being manipulated for Harris campaign ads.

“While we understand why an organization might wish to align itself with the Guardian’s trusted brand, we need to ensure it is being used appropriately and with our permission. We’ll be reaching out to Google for more information about this practice,” a Guardian spokesperson told the outlet.

Other outlets used in the ads include The Independent UK, AP, PBS, CBS News, Time and WDAY Radio, a local North Dakota radio station, Axios reported.

Democratic presidential candidate, U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris (R) and Democratic vice presidential candidate Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (L) appear at a campaign rally at the University of Las Vegas Thomas & Mack Center on August 10, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

One example of the Harris’ ads links to an NPR article, edited to have the headline read “Harris Will Lower Health Costs,” Axios reported. The ad then has the description, “Kamala Harris will lower the cost of high-quality affordable health care,” the outlet found.

Though the ads are sponsored by the campaign and indicate such, Axios noted that it is not at first clear that the text promoting the article is written by Harris’ team. The Harris campaign’s latest gimmick does not violate Google’s policies, according to Axios, and the search engine believes its “sponsored” tag provides enough context for a viewer.

The campaign is trying to use the ads attached to various news stories as a way to give voters “more context,” a source familiar with Harris campaign’s ads team told the outlet.

The Harris campaign’s latest stunt could add to the growing number of questions the vice president has yet to answer. Since launching her campaign three weeks ago, Harris has yet to do a sit-down interview or a press conference. In an attempt to highlight Harris’ media avoidance and policies, the Trump campaign plans to have Senator J.D. Vance trail the vice president on the campaign trail, insiders previously told the Daily Caller. (RELATED: ‘Dam Is Going To Break’: Trump Insiders Forecast Counterattack Against Kamala’s Basement Campaign)

“To highlight that, Senator Vance and President Trump are showing up where Kamala Harris is not,” a campaign spokesperson previously told the Caller.

“Senator Vance is doing the same by going to the same places that Kamala Harris is going but refusing to take questions. Anyone can show up in a state and read off of a script, off a teleprompter, and then leave 20 minutes later, that’s exactly what Joe Biden was doing, and it didn’t work for him. We’re not going to let it work,” the spokesperson continued. [SOURCE]

 
 

GOVERNMENT TODAY_China-Trained Gov Walz Performs Like He's Been Groomed For Decades: What 'Never Let A Serious Crisis Go To Waste' Looks Like, Chicom-Style

Saturday, August 10, 2024

2024 Presidential Election_The Subversion Of Democracy, Courtesy of The Democrat Party Leaders: Pelosi admits to undemocratically forcing Biden off the ticket

 

 

At 13:39 Nancy reveals why she was motivated to force Biden off the ticket he won in a democratic primary process.  

When a very small group of people, independent of a primary process, make this decision to remove an elected candidate after the primary, they show very clearly that they are not a democratic body at all to blatantly disrespect the will of its members, and is therefore fraudulent.

DSSO_The Attack On Tulsi Gabbard: In Her Words

Friday, August 9, 2024

2024 Presidential Election_For The Record: The Planned Parenthood tapes Kamala raided media offices for as a California District Attorney

ANTI-GAY HOAX: CA State Senator Scott Weiner and the case of a fake email account used as yet another anti-gay hoax by another mentally-ill person

 

A state senator from California tweeted about a “threat” from hate mail.

As evidence, state Sen. Scott Wiener of San Francisco posted only one screenshot from a Notes app… he left his cursor in the screenshot, along with spellcheck lines.

In other words, the senator wrote his own Note.

Critics accused him of faking hate mail and compared him to Jussie Smollett, the actor known for falsifying a hate crime in 2019.

“This California state senator seriously tried to fake hate mail but included his cursor and the grammar lines in his screenshot,” one conservative strategist noted on Twitter. “Unreal.”

The senator, for his part, responded to the critiques. He claimed to have been transcribing a voicemail, and he dismissed his political opponents as “conspiracy theorists.”

“For all the MAGA conspiracy theorists out there, the threat was a voicemail. This is a transcription. But have fun spinning around with your conspiracies,” Wiener wrote on Twitter, apparently rolling his eyes.

Some conservatives called on Wiener to release the audio.

“Oh so you got a voicemail death threat and instead of posting the audio you carefully transcribed it, posted the transcript, and never even mentioned that it was a voicemail until everyone doubted your original story? Sure that makes sense, Jussie. Totally believable,” conservative author Matt Walsh wrote on Twitter.

Take a look — 

 

Wiener blamed the “hate mail” on conservative commentator Charlie Kirk.

However, Wiener didn’t accuse Kirk himself of sending the voicemail himself. Rather, the senator accused Kirk of pandering to Q-Anon hysteria, siccing his fans on political opponents, and creating an environment likely to result in hate mail.

“Words have consequences,” Wiener tweeted. “Not even 24 hours after MAGA grifter Charlie Kirk tweeted homophobic lies about me, I received this threat repeating one of his lies. But that was the point: Riling people up against me & other LGBTQ people.”

The state senator had previously gone viral for blithely dismissing the risk factors for monkeypox.

“People will make their own decisions about their own risk levels,” Wiener told The Washington Post over the summer, during the height of the monkeypox outbreak. “If people want to have sex, they are going to have sex.”[SOURCE]

2024 Presidential Election_Great Question, Ted: The reason Harris picked Walz becomes more clear

2024 Presidential Election_When A Convert Speaks Truth: Kari Lake's Guest Speaker Drops A Truth Bomb

2024 Presidential Election_That Pesky China Question Again: Exclusive—Seamus Bruner: Seven Troubling Tim Walz Connections to Communist China

 

                           Exclusive—Seamus Bruner: Seven Troubling Tim Walz Connections to Communist China

Seamus Bruner

Minnesota Governor and Vice-Presidential hopeful Tim Walz has an abnormal relationship with China.

“No matter how long I live, I will never be treated that well again…it was an excellent experience,” Walz said upon his return from the first of many trips there. Walz claims that his Chinese hosts lavished him with “more gifts than I could bring home.”

Walz and his supporters would like us to believe that his cozy ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) are not unusual. In fact, he is “hawkish” and staunch critic of the CCP’s human rights abuses, his media allies say. The Chinese have an expression for the practice of providing cover for the communist regime while issuing the occasional muted critiques: it’s called “big help with a little bad mouth.”

As Breitbart News reported, Walz first visited China in 1989 under the auspices of a now-shuttered Harvard program called WorldTeach. Walz and became so enamored with the country that he and his wife honeymooned there after their marriage on June 4, 1994, the fifth anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. Walz “wanted to have a [wedding anniversary] date he’ll always remember,” according to his wife.


The pro-democracy protest movement of students in Tiananmen Square ended in a blood bath during the night of June 3 to June 4, 1989. Between 1,500 to 4,000 demonstrators were killed and 10,000 wounded when the Chinese Communist Party ordered a military crackdown on the protesters, and the People’s Liberation Army rolled their tanks into the square and opened fire on the crowd. The students were demonstrating to demand more democracy and freedom of thought from the Chinese government. (Jacques Langevin/Getty Images)

The pro-democracy protesters watch as the Chinese communist regime’s tanks rolled into Tiananmen Square during the bloody military crackdown of the democracy demonstrations on June 3 to 4, 1989. (Jacques Langevin/Getty Images)

The pro-democracy protesters are seen on Changan Avenue during the CCP’s bloody military crackdown on June 4, 1989, in Tiananmen Square. (Peter Charlesworth/LightRocket via Getty Images)

The pro-democracy protesters are seen after the military crackdown in Tiananmen Square on the night of June 3 to June 4, 1989. (Jacques Langevin/Getty Images)


People transport a wounded woman during the military crackdown in Tiananmen Square on June 3 to 4, 1989. (David Turnley/Getty Images)
 
Family members try to comfort a grief-stricken mother who just learned that her son was killed during the military crackdown in Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989. (David Turnley/Getty Images)
 
A Chinese man stands alone to block a line of tanks heading towards Tiananmen Square on June 5, 1989, one day after the Tiananmen Square massacre. This courageous unknown man became known to the world simply as “Tank Man.” (AP Photo/Jeff Widener)

The Walz newlyweds brought sixty students with them on their honeymoon, kicking off the first of many student exchange trips to the communist country. Walz and his wife set up a company, Education Travel Adventures Inc., to facilitate the trips to China. They ultimately ended up taking more than thirty trips there.

Walz’s last known trip to China was in 2015, but he continues to meet with communist officials and headline CCP-backed events. Walz’s deep and abiding ties to China—including multiple connections to CCP intelligence front organizations—present troubling national security questions about a potential Harris-Walz administration.

Here are Walz’s top seven connections to the CCP that demand explanation.

1. The CCP approved and even subsidized Walz’s student exchanges.

After his first trip to China in 1989, Walz returned to his teaching job in America and hung a “Chinese banner” in his school office. By 1993, Walz was taking American students on visits to China where he told his students to “downplay their American-ness.”

When asked about why he was so interested in China so early on, Walz stated “China was coming, and that’s the reason that I went.” According to U.S. national security expert John Schindler, “no American would be allowed to run academic exchanges for a couple of decades, on the CCP’s dime, without [Ministry of State Security] approval. It just wouldn’t happen.”

Shockingly, Chinese authorities reportedly covered “a large part of the cost” of the 1993 summer trip. The next year, Walz and the Chinese government jointly sponsored scholarships for American students to visit China. Between 1989 and 2003, Walz travelled with hundreds of students to China.

Did Walz or his travel company, Education Travel Adventures Inc., receive any money from the Chinese government? His public financial disclosures do not go back far enough to know.

2. A CCP diplomat and other CCP government officials attended Walz’s gubernatorial inauguration in January 2019.

A translation from a Chinese government source reveals that, “Acting Consul General Liu Jun congratulated Governor Waltz and expressed his expectation to strengthen cooperation with the new Minnesota government to jointly promote the friendly and cooperative relations between Minnesota and China.”

Why were CCP members at the inauguration of a Minnesota governor and would Chinese diplomats congratulate a sincere critic of China’s human rights abuses?

3. The CCP Diplomat left the Walz inauguration to meet with Walz cronies at Minnesota’s premier globalist non-governmental organization (NGO), Minnesota Global.

According the translated Chinese government press release, “Acting Consul General Liu congratulated [Global Minnesota] on the successful holding of the China Theme Year event and said that the Consulate General looks forward to continuing to strengthen communication with [Global Minnesota] in the new year to promote friendly cooperation between Minnesota and China.”

Global Minnesota is close with Walz and has sponsored at least one his foreign trips (to Finland). Last December, Walz awarded a Global Minnesota nominee for a business award.

Global Minnesota is affiliated with globalist entities like the United Nations and frequently invites Walz for speaking engagements (in 2020, 2021, and 2022).

4. Walz has close connections to a Twin Cities-based organization that houses an alleged secret CCP police station—one of only seven secret CCP police stations in the U.S.

In 2022, Minnesota Global partnered with group called the Chinese American Association of Minnesota (CAAM) to send delegations to China.

CAAM has been accused of housing a CCP intelligence agency “Service Center” (which is effectively a secret CCP police station) in Minnesota. The Daily Caller reported:

The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) United Front Work Department (UFWD) — which at least one U.S. government commission has characterized as a “Chinese intelligence service” — operates so-called “Overseas Chinese Service Centers” (OCSCs) that are housed within various U.S.-based nonprofits. OCSCs were ostensibly set up to promote Chinese culture and assist Chinese citizens living abroad, according to Chinese government records.

In April 2023, the Justice Department busted an alleged CCP Ministry of Public Security outpost, which the DOJ called a “secret police station” used to “monitor and intimidate dissidents” and other critics of Beijing.

Why has Walz failed to shut down this Overseas Chinese Service Center operating out of Minnesota?

5. Then-Congressman Walz praised a CCP-backed event that he attended with CCP diplomats in 2018. 

According the Consulate General of the People’s Republic of China in Chicago, the event Walz attended was “The Greatest Spirit: Embrace China—Beautiful Sichuan” hosted at Minnesota University’s Northrop Theater.

The event was sponsored by the CCP’s All-China Federation of Returned Overseas Chinese (ACFROC). According to the Chinese government website:

US Congressman Waltz commented that 30 years ago, he celebrated Mid-Autumn Festival for the first time in Foshan, Guangdong. As Mid-Autumn Festival stands out in Chinese culture as a special day of family reunion, it was his pleasure to enjoy this performance with everyone together. China and the US have a solid tradition of cultural exchanges, and hopefully both countries can maintain this tradition and amicable relations.

6. Less than one year into his first gubernatorial term, Walz was an honored guest speaker at multiple CCP-backed influence operation events in 2019.

Ten months after his inauguration, Walz accepted a speaking gig from a CCP-backed event, joining the president of the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries (CPAFFC) on the short list of speakers.

Walz was invited to “speak about his experiences [in China] and Minnesota’s connections with China.” Walz also was a guest speaker at the U.S. China Peoples Friendship Association convention in 2019 (alongside CPAFFC President Li Xaolin).

The CPAFFC is effectively a CCP “United Front” cutout that is accused of “directly and malignly influencing” state and local politicians in the U.S., according to the State Department. The CCP’s United Front influence operation is specifically tasked with “co-opting and neutralizing threats to the party’s rule and spreading its influence and propaganda overseas.” Beijing view United Front operation “magic weapon” to advance CCP objectives around the world.

Why is Walz so cozy with obvious CCP intelligence operatives and are they paying him for these speeches?

7. Walz has a long history of making outlandishly pro-CCP comments.

Walz has said that “going [to China] was one of the best things I have ever done” and that if the Chinese “had the proper leadership, there are no limits to what they could accomplish.” He claims that his teaching position Macau Polytechnic University “helped develop his knowledge of China’s unique international status.”

In 2011, Walz said he developed “a great admiration for and a close connection with the Chinese people” after teaching there. He indirectly praised the CCP’s brutal police when he said that China had “almost no crime.”

Walz has also claimed the U.S. does not need to have an “adversarial relationship” with China and that “there was no anti-American feeling [in China] whatsoever.”

Notably, Walz’s gentle criticisms often ignore the aspect of the Chinese system responsible for the brutality: communism. And he recently compared socialism to “neighborliness.” Walz seems to view human rights abuses as events that all countries commit from time to time and move on.

On the twentieth anniversary of Tiananmen Square massacre, Walz said that “every nation has its dark periods that it must come to grips with.” And that “this Nation [the US] is no exception.” While this is true, Walz refers to events in American history that happened over a century ago with far less bloodshed.

Meanwhile, the CCP’s ongoing “break their lineage, break their roots” persecution of ethnic minorities in China is rightly characterized as a crime against humanity and even a genocide.

Why does Tim Walz seem to downplay the undeniable bloodshed of communism and socialism?

This is a developing story.

Seamus Bruner is the author of Controligarchs: Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life and Peter Schweizer’s Head of Research at the Government Accountability Institute. Follow him @SeamusBruner. [SOURCE]